Difference between revisions of "User:AboveSky"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
i've test lastest MJ, with different parts, all we know that nocone is flying like brick in KSP w/FAR, but what exactly 'aerodynamic part' are better than the other?
 
i've test lastest MJ, with different parts, all we know that nocone is flying like brick in KSP w/FAR, but what exactly 'aerodynamic part' are better than the other?
  
'''Small:''' (Rocomax 48-7S; 2 Oscar-B Fuel Tanks; Z-200; SRW; OKTO2; MechJeb 1 left)
+
'''Small:''' (Rokomax 48-7S; 2 Oscar-B Fuel Tanks; Z-200; SRW; OKTO2; MechJeb 1 left)
  
 
Caps
 
Caps
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
'''Medium:'''
 
'''Medium:'''
 +
 
1. Circular intake
 
1. Circular intake
 +
 
2. Clampotron Shielded
 
2. Clampotron Shielded
 +
 
3. AeroDynamyc NoseCone
 
3. AeroDynamyc NoseCone
  
Cone:
+
 
1. FL-A10 - 271,770m
+
Cone S2M: ( TR-2v / (cone) RT10)
2. NCS-Adapter - 264100m
+
 
 +
1. FL-A5  - 495,700m!!!
 +
 
 +
2. FL-A10 - 271,770m
 +
 
 +
3. Modular Girder adapter - 267100m
 +
 
 +
3. NCS-Adapter - 264100m
 +
 
  
 
'''Large:'''
 
'''Large:'''
 +
  
  
  
 
Page is under construction.
 
Page is under construction.

Latest revision as of 13:54, 19 January 2015

FAR: comparative analysis of aerodynamic parts:

i've test lastest MJ, with different parts, all we know that nocone is flying like brick in KSP w/FAR, but what exactly 'aerodynamic part' are better than the other?

Small: (Rokomax 48-7S; 2 Oscar-B Fuel Tanks; Z-200; SRW; OKTO2; MechJeb 1 left)

Caps

1. StayPutnik Mk1 12400m

2. Standart NoseCone 11400m

3. Parachute Mk16 9600m

4. NoCone: 4240m


Medium:

1. Circular intake

2. Clampotron Shielded

3. AeroDynamyc NoseCone


Cone S2M: ( TR-2v / (cone) RT10)

1. FL-A5 - 495,700m!!!

2. FL-A10 - 271,770m

3. Modular Girder adapter - 267100m

3. NCS-Adapter - 264100m


Large:



Page is under construction.