Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Celestials"
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) m (changed formatting of comments) |
(→reorganisation of table of contents: new section) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The moons currently have no realtion to the planets they order, they should either be removed from the diagram, or arranged so that they form columns beneath the planet. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC) | The moons currently have no realtion to the planets they order, they should either be removed from the diagram, or arranged so that they form columns beneath the planet. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Fixed this all on my own, man wiki tables are crazy. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 16:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | : Fixed this all on my own, man wiki tables are crazy. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 16:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == reorganisation of table of contents == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I believe that we should get rid of the list of planets and moons and the list with planets and moons and replace it with picture imaging. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If the planets (and star) could be aligned vertically (from Kerbol to Jool) and to the right of it you could place the moons (mabey in respect to size or distance from parent body.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This could help simplify the chart making it easier and more attractive for people to study the individual bodies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I currently do not have the images to provid for this kind of lay out, but mabey it would look something like this: | ||
+ | Kerbol | ||
+ | |||
+ | Moho | ||
+ | |||
+ | Eve: Gilly | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kerbal: Mün: Minmus | ||
+ | |||
+ | Duna: Ike | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jool: Laythe: Vall: Tylo: Bop (or Tylo: Lythe: Vall: Bop) |
Revision as of 23:20, 8 October 2012
Removal of Images
I personally think the page should not have these images included like it currently does; they take up a large portion of the page and do not add to it. Thecoshman (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think they should remain, if somebody can figure out how to display them horizontally it would look great, and serve as a scale model of the solar system.--Craigmt1 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- You mean like it now is on the main page? Thecoshman (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Moons should be under the planets
The moons currently have no realtion to the planets they order, they should either be removed from the diagram, or arranged so that they form columns beneath the planet. Thecoshman (talk) 07:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed this all on my own, man wiki tables are crazy. Thecoshman (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
reorganisation of table of contents
I believe that we should get rid of the list of planets and moons and the list with planets and moons and replace it with picture imaging.
If the planets (and star) could be aligned vertically (from Kerbol to Jool) and to the right of it you could place the moons (mabey in respect to size or distance from parent body.)
This could help simplify the chart making it easier and more attractive for people to study the individual bodies.
I currently do not have the images to provid for this kind of lay out, but mabey it would look something like this: Kerbol
Moho
Eve: Gilly
Kerbal: Mün: Minmus
Duna: Ike
Jool: Laythe: Vall: Tylo: Bop (or Tylo: Lythe: Vall: Bop)