Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Celestial Bodies"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) (Restarted talk about Moons of Jool being presented in one column. Please speak up to present your view) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* For Single Column: [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | * For Single Column: [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
* Against Single Column: | * Against Single Column: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why don't we just ask N3X15?--[[User:Craigmt1|Craigmt1]] ([[User talk:Craigmt1|talk]]) 04:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 5 October 2012
Have the moons in columns
Whilst my change removing the 'official' name from Kerbol I accept as wrong, I really think the alternate style I had done was much better, where the Moons of Jool are in one column, rather then two. I know it takes up more space, but it is not that much. Thecoshman (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with you, but others have asked me to keep it this way. Personally, I don't feel very strongly about it either way though.--Craigmt1 (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I can accept going with the consensus, but, and don't take this the wrong way, who are these 'others'. Should not all discussion about wiki related issues be kept on the wiki it self? It provides a proper log detailing why things are done the way they are, which will help prevent new people from repeatedly changing something that has been decided to be done in a certain way. Thecoshman (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I thing that at Russian wiki I'll keep this version of template: Template:Celestial Bodies/ru
- I can accept going with the consensus, but, and don't take this the wrong way, who are these 'others'. Should not all discussion about wiki related issues be kept on the wiki it self? It provides a proper log detailing why things are done the way they are, which will help prevent new people from repeatedly changing something that has been decided to be done in a certain way. Thecoshman (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
This is big enough, but easy to understand. --Varden (talk) 00:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- You should try to avoid translation having differing formats, it will help provide a more professional look if all languages presented the information in a consistent way. Thecoshman (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- I want restart this disucsion about having the moons of Jool in a single column. I think it is a much better format for the data, [User:Craigmt1|Craigmt1]] and Varden have both said the agree, but apparently there are some mysterious 'others' who say other wise. Unless these people come forth and present a valid reason to keep the current format I will change to the single column approach soon. It provides a much clearer way of representing the star system at the very insignificant cost of a few extra lines of space. Thecoshman (talk) 07:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Please edit and put you signature ~~~~
- For Single Column: Thecoshman (talk) 07:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Against Single Column:
Why don't we just ask N3X15?--Craigmt1 (talk) 04:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
