Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbin"
(→Orbital information) |
(Asked for information on the attached map to be added) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:: I'm not sure it's the best place for this information, but I linked to the planetary data spreadsheet and text files at [[Celestials#Notes]]. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 10:54, 1 February 2013 (CST) | :: I'm not sure it's the best place for this information, but I linked to the planetary data spreadsheet and text files at [[Celestials#Notes]]. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 10:54, 1 February 2013 (CST) | ||
Well, that will teach me to open my big mouth before checking my facts. I guess the inclination of the other bodies is measured relative to Kerbin. Oops. [[User:Kahlzun|Kahlzun]] ([[User talk:Kahlzun|talk]]) 21:14, 8 February 2013 (CST) | Well, that will teach me to open my big mouth before checking my facts. I guess the inclination of the other bodies is measured relative to Kerbin. Oops. [[User:Kahlzun|Kahlzun]] ([[User talk:Kahlzun|talk]]) 21:14, 8 February 2013 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Map == | ||
+ | Does anyone now what projection the map is in? a link to the relevant page would be nice, it looks like a area accurate map compared to the more common angle accurate (the one google maps uses) |
Revision as of 03:24, 22 April 2013
Infobox
I've attempted to make an infobox template for planets, Template:Planetbox, to bring it closer in line to the stock parts here and planets on wikipedia. Any advice would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigmt (talk • contribs)
- So far, so good. I think you have more columns than you originally anticipated, though, so many of the cellss are floating around. -- N3X15 (talk) 19:22, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, the length of the template is breaking some formatting stuff on articles it's transcluded in. It looks good, but I'd personally trim it down to mass/diameter/etc. and leave orbital information in the article proper. -- Trinexx ► 19:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
So, leave orbital characteristics in the article itself and keep physical characteristics in the box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigmt (talk • contribs)
- That's my personal recommendation, at least. I imagine other people have their own opinions on the matter. -- Trinexx ► 20:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Links
All the links used in the references are broken. Just an FYI. -- N3X15 (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
'Kermunist'
Should this term really be used? Thecoshman (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- There are no factions in the game, so it would be better to not have that in there, as it'd cause confusion. We do need a Manual of Style to cover stuff like this. -- N3X15 (talk) 20:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Atmosphere
I edited the atmosphere section to make clear the units of d_k & p_k after working through gamedata. Still unsure what units p_k are in FlightGlobals.getStaticPressure() values are in atm, with 1 atm = 101325 Pa to get an absolute static pressure value needed for ideal gas law
-Kellven
Should it be mentioned that because Kerbin has plant and animal life, that therefore the atmosphere is similair to our own? That would be a bit quick on the draw given that even our atmosphere is extremly hostile to some earthbound organisms.
--Azivegu (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Orbital information
it mentions in the infobox that Kerbin has a o ecc and 0 inc orbit.. i don't think thats correct, can someone plug the correct figures in?
- Maltesh's rip of the 0.18.2 orbital parameters has those, and a quick check in map view shows Kerbin's altitude and speed not changing anywhere in the orbit, so it should still be correct. UmbralRaptor (talk) 06:48, 1 February 2013 (CST)
- I'm not sure it's the best place for this information, but I linked to the planetary data spreadsheet and text files at Celestials#Notes. — Elembis (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2013 (CST)
Well, that will teach me to open my big mouth before checking my facts. I guess the inclination of the other bodies is measured relative to Kerbin. Oops. Kahlzun (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2013 (CST)
Map
Does anyone now what projection the map is in? a link to the relevant page would be nice, it looks like a area accurate map compared to the more common angle accurate (the one google maps uses)