Difference between revisions of "Talk:CFG File Documentation"
(→Suggested change to Outdated tag) |
(→Suggested change to Outdated tag) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
}} | }} | ||
:It also adds a note to your page, in case somebody want to help improve it (all edits going on this page are basically “lost”, unless somebody manually merge/add them to your version). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:30, 6 September 2013 (CDT) | :It also adds a note to your page, in case somebody want to help improve it (all edits going on this page are basically “lost”, unless somebody manually merge/add them to your version). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:30, 6 September 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :I can understand that, and it's why I posted here instead of editing the thread directly, I'm pretty new to this wiki stuff but this page has irritated me to no end. | ||
| + | This might not be the best place to discuss it but Outdated really irritates me, by having comment: at the end of the line it creates this big pile of text falling over what Outdated adds to the box, or if it's a small comment, it just disappears at the end following a big stretch of what readers consider ignorable fluff. If comment was on it's own line, maybe with a line break, the whole thing would be better | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Box|'''This page is in need of being brought up to date.''' Please help Kerbal Space Program Wiki by fixing inaccurate or outdated information. | ||
| + | * Large portions of this page describe legacy mode options and deprecated concepts (roughly KSP 0.15.0) that are against current best practices. <br /> | ||
| + | * This page is no longer sufficient to create a part.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think bullet lists look good for multiple items; I imagine most pages won't have multiple items but the bullet makes a good replacement for <newline>Comment: | ||
| + | Multiple boxes definitely wasn't needed and I agree with the condensed text, but my revision is very early and scattered, featuring it prominently at this point could be damaging, maybe a link at the bottom of the page instead?<br />--[[User:Greys|Greys]] ([[User talk:Greys|talk]]) 01:15, 7 September 2013 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:15, 7 September 2013
This is really in need of a .18+ update.
seconded Medavox (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2013 (CDT)
Suggested change to Outdated tag
 | This page or section is in need of being brought up to date. Please help Kerbal Space Program Wiki by fixing inaccurate or outdated information. |
This will help readers to understand the problems with the document until the page is properly updated
--Greys (talk) 12:21, 6 September 2013 (CDT)
- Although I agree with the general notion of this suggestion, I would say this is overkill. Especially the last three boxes say the same. Something like this:
| This page or section is in need of being brought up to date. Please help Kerbal Space Program Wiki by fixing inaccurate or outdated information. Large portions of this page describe legacy mode options and deprecated concepts (roughly KSP 0.15.0) that are against current best practices. This page is no longer sufficient to create a part. There is currently an updated version in development created by Greys on his userpage: User:Greys |
- It also adds a note to your page, in case somebody want to help improve it (all edits going on this page are basically “lost”, unless somebody manually merge/add them to your version). — xZise [talk] 14:30, 6 September 2013 (CDT)
- I can understand that, and it's why I posted here instead of editing the thread directly, I'm pretty new to this wiki stuff but this page has irritated me to no end.
This might not be the best place to discuss it but Outdated really irritates me, by having comment: at the end of the line it creates this big pile of text falling over what Outdated adds to the box, or if it's a small comment, it just disappears at the end following a big stretch of what readers consider ignorable fluff. If comment was on it's own line, maybe with a line break, the whole thing would be better
I think bullet lists look good for multiple items; I imagine most pages won't have multiple items but the bullet makes a good replacement for <newline>Comment:
Multiple boxes definitely wasn't needed and I agree with the condensed text, but my revision is very early and scattered, featuring it prominently at this point could be damaging, maybe a link at the bottom of the page instead?
--Greys (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2013 (CDT)
