Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Celestial Bodies"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I agree with you, but others have asked me to keep it this way. Personally, I don't feel very strongly about it either way though.--[[User:Craigmt1|Craigmt1]] ([[User talk:Craigmt1|talk]]) 21:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | :I agree with you, but others have asked me to keep it this way. Personally, I don't feel very strongly about it either way though.--[[User:Craigmt1|Craigmt1]] ([[User talk:Craigmt1|talk]]) 21:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
:: I can accept going with the consensus, but, and don't take this the wrong way, who are these 'others'. Should not all discussion about wiki related issues be kept on the wiki it self? It provides a proper log detailing why things are done the way they are, which will help prevent new people from repeatedly changing something that has been decided to be done in a certain way. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 21:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | :: I can accept going with the consensus, but, and don't take this the wrong way, who are these 'others'. Should not all discussion about wiki related issues be kept on the wiki it self? It provides a proper log detailing why things are done the way they are, which will help prevent new people from repeatedly changing something that has been decided to be done in a certain way. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 21:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | I thing that at Russian wiki I'll keep this version of template: {{Celestial Bodies/ru}} | ||
| + | This is big enough, but easy to understand. | ||
| + | --[[User:Varden|Varden]] ([[User talk:Varden|talk]]) 00:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:07, 30 September 2012
Have the moons in columns
Whilst my change removing the 'official' name from Kerbol I accept as wrong, I really think the alternate style I had done was much better, where the Moons of Jool are in one column, rather then two. I know it takes up more space, but it is not that much. Thecoshman (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with you, but others have asked me to keep it this way. Personally, I don't feel very strongly about it either way though.--Craigmt1 (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I can accept going with the consensus, but, and don't take this the wrong way, who are these 'others'. Should not all discussion about wiki related issues be kept on the wiki it self? It provides a proper log detailing why things are done the way they are, which will help prevent new people from repeatedly changing something that has been decided to be done in a certain way. Thecoshman (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
I thing that at Russian wiki I'll keep this version of template: Template:Celestial Bodies/ru This is big enough, but easy to understand. --Varden (talk) 00:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
