Difference between revisions of "Talk:Advanced Reaction Wheel Module, Large"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (box photo question)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Does the visual appearance of the attachment node make a difference in the behavior of a part?  This part is a large diameter but only a medium attachment node in the Vehicle Assembly view.
 
Does the visual appearance of the attachment node make a difference in the behavior of a part?  This part is a large diameter but only a medium attachment node in the Vehicle Assembly view.
 
: It's purely a visual effect, IIRC. Nothing about compatibility or strength. [[User:UmbralRaptor|UmbralRaptor]] ([[User talk:UmbralRaptor|talk]]) 12:35, 16 November 2013 (CST)
 
: It's purely a visual effect, IIRC. Nothing about compatibility or strength. [[User:UmbralRaptor|UmbralRaptor]] ([[User talk:UmbralRaptor|talk]]) 12:35, 16 November 2013 (CST)
 +
 +
Should the picture in the box be replaced for consistency?  It is a png, but I don't think I should update it, since it is more of an application example rather than a part diagram. — [[User:Chuzzard|Chuzzard]] ([[User talk:Chuzzard|talk]]) 18:22, 2 May 2014 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:22, 2 May 2014

Does the visual appearance of the attachment node make a difference in the behavior of a part? This part is a large diameter but only a medium attachment node in the Vehicle Assembly view.

It's purely a visual effect, IIRC. Nothing about compatibility or strength. UmbralRaptor (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2013 (CST)

Should the picture in the box be replaced for consistency? It is a png, but I don't think I should update it, since it is more of an application example rather than a part diagram. — Chuzzard (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2014 (CDT)