Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bop"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Synchronous orbit around Bop is impossible.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST)
 
:Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST)
 +
 +
"Bop gains its shape of a brown crunched up ball of paper is caused by its low gravity"
 +
Can someone tidy this up? There are a few sentences that make no sense, and i don't even know what the quoted one is saying?[[User:Kahlzun|Kahlzun]] ([[User talk:Kahlzun|talk]]) 01:52, 3 March 2013 (CST)

Revision as of 07:52, 3 March 2013

Is the data under Orbital Statistics correct? It contradicts the information in the planetbox...

Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — Elembis (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST)

"Bop gains its shape of a brown crunched up ball of paper is caused by its low gravity" Can someone tidy this up? There are a few sentences that make no sense, and i don't even know what the quoted one is saying?Kahlzun (talk) 01:52, 3 March 2013 (CST)