Difference between revisions of "Talk:Control surface"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Active winglets should be in a separate table, and probably put on the Winglets page.)
 
m (]]s)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think grouping the active-control winglets – especially ones with “winglet” literally in their name – in with control surfaces isn't as good a way as it could be to emphasize that they're involved with flight control. I think it'd be better to make a second table for active winglets (and canards), include that in [[Winglets]], and either also include the table here or just mention in a one-sentence paragraph that there are these special winglets that are also effective control surfaces. --[[User:Brendan|Brendan]] ([[User talk:Brendan|talk]]) 05:54, 24 August 2014 (CDT)
+
I think grouping the active-control winglets – especially ones with “winglet” literally in their name – in with control surfaces isn't as good a way as it could be to emphasize that they're involved with flight control. I think it'd be better to make a second table for active winglets (and canards), include that in [[Winglet]]s, and either also include the table here or just mention in a one-sentence paragraph that there are these special winglets that are also effective control surfaces. --[[User:Brendan|Brendan]] ([[User talk:Brendan|talk]]) 05:54, 24 August 2014 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:55, 24 August 2014

I think grouping the active-control winglets – especially ones with “winglet” literally in their name – in with control surfaces isn't as good a way as it could be to emphasize that they're involved with flight control. I think it'd be better to make a second table for active winglets (and canards), include that in Winglets, and either also include the table here or just mention in a one-sentence paragraph that there are these special winglets that are also effective control surfaces. --Brendan (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2014 (CDT)