Difference between revisions of "Talk:Duna"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Moving section I removed from the main article to here.)
 
(Duna Gravity borked.: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Refrence ==
 
== Refrence ==
 
I did the stationary calculation on [http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpgravity/keplers_law_equation_period.php this site], imputing the mass of the planet, and trial and error on the orbital radi. It is untested, so it might be wrong. (3185,5 km orbit gave the same ammount of seconds the plant day is, minus the radi' of the planet). It seems that the dunasync orbit is exactly the same as kerbins :) <small>— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Djnekkid|Djnekkid]] ([[User talk:Djnekkid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djnekkid|contribs]])</small>
 
I did the stationary calculation on [http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpgravity/keplers_law_equation_period.php this site], imputing the mass of the planet, and trial and error on the orbital radi. It is untested, so it might be wrong. (3185,5 km orbit gave the same ammount of seconds the plant day is, minus the radi' of the planet). It seems that the dunasync orbit is exactly the same as kerbins :) <small>— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Djnekkid|Djnekkid]] ([[User talk:Djnekkid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djnekkid|contribs]])</small>
 +
 +
== Duna Gravity borked. ==
 +
 +
Someone, fix the Gravitational Parameter!
 +
 +
It's throwing all my calculations out XD

Revision as of 23:36, 13 October 2012

Refrence

I did the stationary calculation on this site, imputing the mass of the planet, and trial and error on the orbital radi. It is untested, so it might be wrong. (3185,5 km orbit gave the same ammount of seconds the plant day is, minus the radi' of the planet). It seems that the dunasync orbit is exactly the same as kerbins :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djnekkid (talkcontribs)

Duna Gravity borked.

Someone, fix the Gravitational Parameter!

It's throwing all my calculations out XD