Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parts/Command Pods"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
m |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:CookieCrunch|CookieCrunch]] ([[User talk:CookieCrunch|talk]]) 18:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:CookieCrunch|CookieCrunch]] ([[User talk:CookieCrunch|talk]]) 18:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
: It was done so that these sub-pages can be included into '[[parts]]', I am not sure exactly why it was done this way though. The way these parts/* pages are include into the main page is a bit odd. If you do change anything, please be careful with it, these pages are a bit odd [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | : It was done so that these sub-pages can be included into '[[parts]]', I am not sure exactly why it was done this way though. The way these parts/* pages are include into the main page is a bit odd. If you do change anything, please be careful with it, these pages are a bit odd [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :: It seems to me that changing the name of this template page is not needed and creates unnecessary work. The problem with deleting this page | + | :: It seems to me that changing the name of this template page is not needed and creates unnecessary work. The problem with deleting this page is that it is the table/template that the [[Command Module]]s page uses. In short this is just a template, not an an actual page, but is required for the [[Command Module]]s page to function.[[User:Jlmr|Jlmr]] ([[User talk:Jlmr|talk]]) 18:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:14, 27 October 2012
Naming Convention
Is there a reason why this page is called "Parts/Command Pods" rather than just "Command Modules"? There are also a couple of similar pages with the "Parts/" prefix. I suggest to delete that prefix from the other pages and delete this page completely in favor of Command Modules. --CookieCrunch (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- It was done so that these sub-pages can be included into 'parts', I am not sure exactly why it was done this way though. The way these parts/* pages are include into the main page is a bit odd. If you do change anything, please be careful with it, these pages are a bit odd Thecoshman (talk) 07:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- It seems to me that changing the name of this template page is not needed and creates unnecessary work. The problem with deleting this page is that it is the table/template that the Command Modules page uses. In short this is just a template, not an an actual page, but is required for the Command Modules page to function.Jlmr (talk) 18:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)