Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Parts"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Divide into better catagoires)
(Divide into better catagoires)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
: At the top level, I think we should categorize them the way that the game does -- according to tab in VAB. Beyond that we can separate them by subcategory, either with blank lines (the current approach, which means a lot of extra space) or with a different kind of character separator ("——", perhaps?). — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 07:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 
: At the top level, I think we should categorize them the way that the game does -- according to tab in VAB. Beyond that we can separate them by subcategory, either with blank lines (the current approach, which means a lot of extra space) or with a different kind of character separator ("——", perhaps?). — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 07:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: Perhaps we should look at having another page/table that categorises the parts by their practical use, like [[Parts]] does, or maybe have this table link to it. At the least, I think I prefer your idea or using a wide dash to separate the parts, rather then new lines. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 08:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
  
 
== recent change to grouping of items ==
 
== recent change to grouping of items ==
  
 
A recent change has put a lot of new lines and this is now taking up a lot more space, I think it was better before. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 06:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 
A recent change has put a lot of new lines and this is now taking up a lot more space, I think it was better before. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 06:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:57, 2 October 2012

Divide into better catagoires

The parts are currently organised based on how they are selected in the game, I think it would be more manageable if it it was broken down into the following categories. If you don't agree with the categories I propose, suggest how you would like them to be ordered.

  • Command Pods
  • Liquid Fuel Tanks
  • Liquid Fuel Engines
  • Solid Rocket Boosters
  • Control Systems (things like RCS tanks and jets, ASAS units)
  • Wings (including the control surfaces etc)
  • Landing Gear (legs, wheels and perhaps parachutes)
  • Structural (struts, fuel pipes, staging units)
  • Miscellaneous (all the other stuff)

If the miscellaneous categort ever starts to get rather full, it should be looked at to see if a new category could be made, for instance when docking system get introduced. Thecoshman (talk) 10:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

At the top level, I think we should categorize them the way that the game does -- according to tab in VAB. Beyond that we can separate them by subcategory, either with blank lines (the current approach, which means a lot of extra space) or with a different kind of character separator ("——", perhaps?). — Elembis (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps we should look at having another page/table that categorises the parts by their practical use, like Parts does, or maybe have this table link to it. At the least, I think I prefer your idea or using a wide dash to separate the parts, rather then new lines. Thecoshman (talk) 08:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

recent change to grouping of items

A recent change has put a lot of new lines and this is now taking up a lot more space, I think it was better before. Thecoshman (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)