Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stats Table Cargo"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Roman numerals and tank comparison ==
 
# what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game)
 
# what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game)
 
# The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted!
 
# The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted!
 +
<small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NWM|contribs]]) 02:35, 1 March 2015‎ (UTC)</small>
 
:Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=57870&oldid=57306 here] and [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=next&oldid=57870 here] to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*).
 
:Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=57870&oldid=57306 here] and [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=next&oldid=57870 here] to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*).
 
:I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST)
 
:I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST)
 +
:By the way sign your posts and use the “Add topic” feature. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 10:54, 1 March 2015 (CST)

Revision as of 16:54, 1 March 2015

Roman numerals and tank comparison

  1. what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game)
  2. The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NWM (talkcontribs) 02:35, 1 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it here and here to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*).
I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — xZise [talk] 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST)
By the way sign your posts and use the “Add topic” feature. — xZise [talk] 10:54, 1 March 2015 (CST)