Difference between revisions of "User talk:XZise"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Infobox concept)
(+add times for all posts;)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
== I's Sorry ==
 
== I's Sorry ==
  
I'm sorry, I'm just an update, just as a joke. Confusing sorry got side.[[ysjbserver]]
+
I'm sorry, I'm just an update, just as a joke. Confusing sorry got side.[[User:ysjbserver|ysjbserver]] 05:43, 13 February 2014‎ (UTC)
 
+
:For what ever reason you did that, it's “okay” (as in you won't be blocked) as it didn't broke anything and it was the only incident. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)
 
 
  
 
== Notice from the original writer of the Oxygen page ==
 
== Notice from the original writer of the Oxygen page ==
  
I'd like to thank you for imporving upon my work, it is much appreciated. Thanks, [[User:LiquidLight|-LiquidLight]]
+
I'd like to thank you for imporving upon my work, it is much appreciated. Thanks, [[User:LiquidLight|-LiquidLight]] 08:38, 17 October 2013‎ (UTC)
 +
:You are welcome. I try to preserve as much as possible without annoying the original authors. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)
  
 
== How old are you? ==
 
== How old are you? ==
Line 26: Line 26:
 
== planed features changes ==
 
== planed features changes ==
  
both the massive parts and the astaroids are confermed by harvisteR in that streem, he says that astaroids will be in the main game, but other things that include the nasa pack will be separate, i will post a better link to the stream in a second. i actually took the geysers from a post on [[gas planet 2]]. also look at today's dev note it confirms everything
+
both the massive parts and the astaroids are confermed by harvisteR in that streem, he says that astaroids will be in the main game, but other things that include the nasa pack will be separate, i will post a better link to the stream in a second. i actually took the geysers from a post on [[gas planet 2]]. also look at today's dev note it confirms everything <small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Krona|Krona]] ([[User talk:Krona|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Krona|contribs]]) 03:15, 19 February 2014‎ (UTC)</small>
  
 
== Infobox concept ==
 
== Infobox concept ==

Revision as of 14:03, 27 March 2014


Archives
2013
Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2014
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2015
Jan
Threads older than 31 days may be archived by RoboJeb.
Edit this box

I's Sorry

I'm sorry, I'm just an update, just as a joke. Confusing sorry got side.ysjbserver 05:43, 13 February 2014‎ (UTC)

For what ever reason you did that, it's “okay” (as in you won't be blocked) as it didn't broke anything and it was the only incident. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)

Notice from the original writer of the Oxygen page

I'd like to thank you for imporving upon my work, it is much appreciated. Thanks, -LiquidLight 08:38, 17 October 2013‎ (UTC)

You are welcome. I try to preserve as much as possible without annoying the original authors. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)

How old are you?

Well how old? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montana (talkcontribs) 19:08, 16 February 2014‎ (UTC)

I don't know what is happening here, but I decline here. — xZise [talk] 15:56, 16 February 2014 (CST)

planed features changes

both the massive parts and the astaroids are confermed by harvisteR in that streem, he says that astaroids will be in the main game, but other things that include the nasa pack will be separate, i will post a better link to the stream in a second. i actually took the geysers from a post on gas planet 2. also look at today's dev note it confirms everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krona (talkcontribs) 03:15, 19 February 2014‎ (UTC)

Infobox concept

Hi, I did get confused which system was the one to go for; I think I actually already changed one or two the wrong way around. So it looks like we're using Infobox/Part | data |more={{ additional items }}, right?

Very new to Wiki editing, is this the right way to respond or should I have edited your talk msg?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniu (talkcontribs) 13:19, 27 March 2014‎ (UTC)

I'm actually not sure which is the best way. I usually response below the message to have a flow for other readers. But positing on the others one talk page will notify the user.
Now actually they are transitioning to the sytem using the more parameter, because that easily allow constructs like R.A.P.I.E.R. Engine/Box where there are two different types of infoboxes (without always creating a new one every time). A little discussion is at Template talk:Infobox/Part#Rework the template?. Unfortunately not all templates can be converted yet (but liquid fuel engines and command modules should work fine).
And yes you actually reverted one of my changes, but that not a problem. I fixed that quickly (and that's one of the reasons I contacted you, so you know why I reverted your changes once).
Also the <noinclude>{{Data template used}}</noinclude> is simply to tell others that it is not a real article, which for example happend here. — xZise [talk] 08:51, 27 March 2014 (CDT)