Difference between revisions of "User talk:KWman"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Objectivity: new section)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Hi KWman. First of all welcome to the wiki. But your [[KWrocketry]] article is problematic. First of all it's not objective and there might be people who don't think it's the best mod. Especially together with MJ as some seem to really despise it. Basically if you write something, write it from an objective perspective. And that is now the second problem: There is not much to tell about. I'll just change it into a redirect to [[list of mods]]. The old version is still visible if you think you can make a proper article from it. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 15:23, 8 February 2015 (CST)
 
Hi KWman. First of all welcome to the wiki. But your [[KWrocketry]] article is problematic. First of all it's not objective and there might be people who don't think it's the best mod. Especially together with MJ as some seem to really despise it. Basically if you write something, write it from an objective perspective. And that is now the second problem: There is not much to tell about. I'll just change it into a redirect to [[list of mods]]. The old version is still visible if you think you can make a proper article from it. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 15:23, 8 February 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
Thanks for the information.

Revision as of 15:05, 9 February 2015

Objectivity

Hi KWman. First of all welcome to the wiki. But your KWrocketry article is problematic. First of all it's not objective and there might be people who don't think it's the best mod. Especially together with MJ as some seem to really despise it. Basically if you write something, write it from an objective perspective. And that is now the second problem: There is not much to tell about. I'll just change it into a redirect to list of mods. The old version is still visible if you think you can make a proper article from it. — xZise [talk] 15:23, 8 February 2015 (CST)

Thanks for the information.