Difference between revisions of "User talk:XZise/Archives/2014/04"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(Robot: Archiving 1 thread from User talk:XZise.) |
m (Robot: Archiving 2 threads from User talk:XZise.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thanks for the tip, sorry it took me so long to reply! [[User:Medavox|Medavox]] ([[User talk:Medavox|talk]]) 05:28, 5 April 2014 (CDT) | Thanks for the tip, sorry it took me so long to reply! [[User:Medavox|Medavox]] ([[User talk:Medavox|talk]]) 05:28, 5 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | == Calculation Tools page is done == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just bringing this to your attention, as you might have missed my last edits to that. It's ready for evaluation and inclusion at your discretion :P I don't need anything done, just making sure you know. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:MechaLynx|MechaLynx]] ([[User talk:MechaLynx|talk]]) 21:01, 20 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Thank you == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thank you for changing my section about Falcon heavy the site was confusing and I did my best to make the rocket similar. I am just happy that you did not delete it as what happened on another wiki... or as I do on one wiki I am a moderator for.<small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LABHOUSE|LABHOUSE]] ([[User talk:LABHOUSE|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LABHOUSE|contribs]]) 00:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
+ | :Simply deleting is the easy way out. Although I might delete something as adding the Falcon Heavy twice only increase maintenance. For example on the tutorial to the [[Tutorial:Salyut_programme#Launcher|Salyut programme]] the Proton-K was referenced but with a link to the [[Tutorial: ISS]] article. Also we don't know if the Falcon Heavy will be used for the ISS, so maybe the Falcon Heavy should only be referenced in the Mars One article, and the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:09, 22 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::Yeah, deleting is the easy way out I cannot imagine how many trolls are on here 10 come every month on a smaller wiki. Should I also but in the description that you can make a normal falcon nine rocket by making a falcon heavy without boosters? And NASA has a contract with space x to send a crew to the iss in 2016 I think and Dragon just won't make the cut I think so there is a chance for them to use the falcon heavy. It would not surprise me if space x buys the iss after nasa and esa and csa and the Russians are done with it. [[User:LABHOUSE|LABHOUSE]] ([[User talk:LABHOUSE|talk]]) 16:51, 22 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | :::Now of course you could, and maybe should, mention that the Falcon Heavy consists of three Falcon 9 1.1 first stages and one second stage. So there could be the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial and you could reference the Falcon 9 from the Mars One tutorial (that the Falcon Heavy uses two additional Falcon 9 first stages). | ||
+ | :::I also don't think that a Falcon Heavy is necessary for the manned Dragon capsule, but I can't find any sources for that. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 03:22, 23 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::::Well given the fact they will launch the mars transit vehicle in two pieces my guess is they do need it and certainly do for when they launch the tonne of food tonne of habits and stuff. This is beginning to just be a place to speak of Mars One so I will go to the site to get more info on them using the falcon heavy I will see how much it will weight as well to be sure. 8580 pounds and they will send 6 of these on one launch and the mars transit vehicle I cannot figure it's weight. The falcon heavy can put 75000 pounds into EARTH orbit and mars is pretty far away so that explains it kinda. [[User:LABHOUSE|LABHOUSE]] ([[User talk:LABHOUSE|talk]]) 16:29, 23 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
+ | :::::Ehrm resupplying the ISS and going to Mars are two different things. Especially as you need more space for the crew when you travel to Mars. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:46, 24 April 2014 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 31 July 2014
Editing Tips
Thanks for the tip, sorry it took me so long to reply! Medavox (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2014 (CDT)
Calculation Tools page is done
Just bringing this to your attention, as you might have missed my last edits to that. It's ready for evaluation and inclusion at your discretion :P I don't need anything done, just making sure you know.
--MechaLynx (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2014 (CDT)
Thank you
Thank you for changing my section about Falcon heavy the site was confusing and I did my best to make the rocket similar. I am just happy that you did not delete it as what happened on another wiki... or as I do on one wiki I am a moderator for.— Preceding unsigned comment added by LABHOUSE (talk • contribs) 00:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Simply deleting is the easy way out. Although I might delete something as adding the Falcon Heavy twice only increase maintenance. For example on the tutorial to the Salyut programme the Proton-K was referenced but with a link to the Tutorial: ISS article. Also we don't know if the Falcon Heavy will be used for the ISS, so maybe the Falcon Heavy should only be referenced in the Mars One article, and the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial. — xZise [talk] 05:09, 22 April 2014 (CDT)
- Yeah, deleting is the easy way out I cannot imagine how many trolls are on here 10 come every month on a smaller wiki. Should I also but in the description that you can make a normal falcon nine rocket by making a falcon heavy without boosters? And NASA has a contract with space x to send a crew to the iss in 2016 I think and Dragon just won't make the cut I think so there is a chance for them to use the falcon heavy. It would not surprise me if space x buys the iss after nasa and esa and csa and the Russians are done with it. LABHOUSE (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2014 (CDT)
- Now of course you could, and maybe should, mention that the Falcon Heavy consists of three Falcon 9 1.1 first stages and one second stage. So there could be the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial and you could reference the Falcon 9 from the Mars One tutorial (that the Falcon Heavy uses two additional Falcon 9 first stages).
- I also don't think that a Falcon Heavy is necessary for the manned Dragon capsule, but I can't find any sources for that. — xZise [talk] 03:22, 23 April 2014 (CDT)
- Well given the fact they will launch the mars transit vehicle in two pieces my guess is they do need it and certainly do for when they launch the tonne of food tonne of habits and stuff. This is beginning to just be a place to speak of Mars One so I will go to the site to get more info on them using the falcon heavy I will see how much it will weight as well to be sure. 8580 pounds and they will send 6 of these on one launch and the mars transit vehicle I cannot figure it's weight. The falcon heavy can put 75000 pounds into EARTH orbit and mars is pretty far away so that explains it kinda. LABHOUSE (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2014 (CDT)
- Yeah, deleting is the easy way out I cannot imagine how many trolls are on here 10 come every month on a smaller wiki. Should I also but in the description that you can make a normal falcon nine rocket by making a falcon heavy without boosters? And NASA has a contract with space x to send a crew to the iss in 2016 I think and Dragon just won't make the cut I think so there is a chance for them to use the falcon heavy. It would not surprise me if space x buys the iss after nasa and esa and csa and the Russians are done with it. LABHOUSE (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2014 (CDT)