Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stats Table Cargo"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Roman numerals and tank comparison == | ||
# what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game) | # what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game) | ||
# The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted! | # The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted! | ||
| + | <small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NWM|contribs]]) 02:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
:Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=57870&oldid=57306 here] and [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=next&oldid=57870 here] to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*). | :Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=57870&oldid=57306 here] and [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Radial_size&diff=next&oldid=57870 here] to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*). | ||
:I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST) | :I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST) | ||
| + | :By the way sign your posts and use the “Add topic” feature. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 10:54, 1 March 2015 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 1 March 2015
Roman numerals and tank comparison
- what the f*ck is that ii and iii? Is there any life form over Brendan use it instead of the common Mk2 and Mk3 or knows what sh*t it is? (s1, small... derives from game)
- The Jumbo is 7,5m tall, and not 10m! That is the reason, why those tanks were not noted!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NWM (talk • contribs) 02:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Woho, calm down. First of all Brendan added it here and here to the template. I'm not sure what your problem is with it. Before they added the Roman numerals, I had added that the numbers (and not names) should be used preferably so that it's easy to rename the sizes. I guess they wanted to follow the same scheme. And considering that the old Mk* and new Mk* are quite different I'd say it would have been important if the old parts weren't removed (because then you'd have old Mk* and new Mk*).
- I can't really do the measurement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for the Mk2 parts they were a relatively close fit to the noted tanks. (I'll query Brendan to make them aware) — xZise [talk] 10:52, 1 March 2015 (CST)
- By the way sign your posts and use the “Add topic” feature. — xZise [talk] 10:54, 1 March 2015 (CST)
