Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Planetbox 2.0"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(Template:PlanetBoxRow implements the "N/A" behavior I described.) |
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) (→Redundant template?: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::: It's already done. =) Check out how [[Template:Planetbox]] uses [[Template:PlanetBoxRow]], especially down toward the end. The latter takes 3 arguments: name ("Radius"), value ("320"), and units ("km"). If the value is "N/A", the row isn't displayed. | ::::: It's already done. =) Check out how [[Template:Planetbox]] uses [[Template:PlanetBoxRow]], especially down toward the end. The latter takes 3 arguments: name ("Radius"), value ("320"), and units ("km"). If the value is "N/A", the row isn't displayed. | ||
::::: By the way, you can sign a comment easily by adding "<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>" to the end of it. The wiki will turn that into a signature automatically. (Four tildes will make your signature include the date, too.) — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 07:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | ::::: By the way, you can sign a comment easily by adding "<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>" to the end of it. The wiki will turn that into a signature automatically. (Four tildes will make your signature include the date, too.) — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 07:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Redundant template? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does this mean that no pages should be using this template any more? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Currently I [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Planetbox_2.0|see there are two]] pages that use this template. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 07:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:49, 16 October 2012
Why is this a separate page? Just merge it with the old one.--Craigmt1 (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. I've modified the old one so that if an argument is specified as "N/A", that row won't show up. This way we can add attributes for atmospheric properties, for example, without polluting the infoboxes of celestial bodies with no atmospheres. — Elembis (talk) 02:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- My thinking was that a blank argument might simply mean it was added to the template and not specified on some pages that used it -- in that case, you'd want "??" to appear (or something similar) until someone filled the information in. In other cases, fields are simply not applicable, so it seemed like using a value of "N/A" for that was the right thing to do. — Elembis (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- If you could do that, that would be great. That is kind of the reason why i also put in the value: Atmosphere Present. That way you see it real quick. The reason i added atmosphere is because i see it becoming ever more important and i believe it wil occupy an ever growing role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azivegu (talk • contribs)
- It's already done. =) Check out how Template:Planetbox uses Template:PlanetBoxRow, especially down toward the end. The latter takes 3 arguments: name ("Radius"), value ("320"), and units ("km"). If the value is "N/A", the row isn't displayed.
- By the way, you can sign a comment easily by adding "~~~" to the end of it. The wiki will turn that into a signature automatically. (Four tildes will make your signature include the date, too.) — Elembis (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Redundant template?
Does this mean that no pages should be using this template any more?
Currently I see there are two pages that use this template. Thecoshman (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
