Difference between revisions of "User talk:Zombie Elvis"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Your contribution to thrust-to-weight ratio: new section)
 
(Missunderstood change in 1.0: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* I tried to make your “clumsy” sentence not so clumsy. I hope that I described it physically correct, but afaik the TWR is not important to “escape” a body (either by reaching escape velocity or leaving the sphere of influence). It is only important to land and start (but not for the complete landing and starting, the TWR is important as long as the craft has not enough time to (return to) orbit).
 
* I tried to make your “clumsy” sentence not so clumsy. I hope that I described it physically correct, but afaik the TWR is not important to “escape” a body (either by reaching escape velocity or leaving the sphere of influence). It is only important to land and start (but not for the complete landing and starting, the TWR is important as long as the craft has not enough time to (return to) orbit).
 
— [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 04:07, 7 October 2013 (CDT)
 
— [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 04:07, 7 October 2013 (CDT)
 +
 +
== Missunderstood change in 1.0 ==
 +
 +
Hi in [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?title=Thrust-to-weight_ratio&curid=3454&diff=65882&oldid=62728 you mention drag before 1.0]. That is true but not relevant for TWR. What is that the thrust depends on pressure and that changed with 1.0. Before 1.0 the fuel flow changed in reaction to a changing Isp but with 1.0 the fuel flow is fixed and the thrust changes to react to the changing Isp (both times with a fixed throttle). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 10:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:27, 28 June 2015

Your contribution to thrust-to-weight ratio

Hi, thank you for your contributions. Two little things:

  • I changed the name back to lower cased version: It should be clear what the letters TWR stand for. Also the English Wikipedia also uses the lowercased name: All acronyms are written with uppercased letters even when they originate from a lowercased word.
  • I tried to make your “clumsy” sentence not so clumsy. I hope that I described it physically correct, but afaik the TWR is not important to “escape” a body (either by reaching escape velocity or leaving the sphere of influence). It is only important to land and start (but not for the complete landing and starting, the TWR is important as long as the craft has not enough time to (return to) orbit).

xZise [talk] 04:07, 7 October 2013 (CDT)

Missunderstood change in 1.0

Hi in you mention drag before 1.0. That is true but not relevant for TWR. What is that the thrust depends on pressure and that changed with 1.0. Before 1.0 the fuel flow changed in reaction to a changing Isp but with 1.0 the fuel flow is fixed and the thrust changes to react to the changing Isp (both times with a fixed throttle). — xZise [talk] 10:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)