Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bop"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(Synchronous orbit around Bop is impossible.) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST) | :Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | "Bop gains its shape of a brown crunched up ball of paper is caused by its low gravity" | ||
+ | Can someone tidy this up? There are a few sentences that make no sense, and i don't even know what the quoted one is saying?[[User:Kahlzun|Kahlzun]] ([[User talk:Kahlzun|talk]]) 01:52, 3 March 2013 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Fixed. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 06:00, 3 March 2013 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 12:00, 3 March 2013
Is the data under Orbital Statistics correct? It contradicts the information in the planetbox...
- Good catch. Bop's semi-major axis was increased in 0.18.2, and I believe that's when its rotation period was increased to compensate (so it could be tidally locked). The planetbox is right: synchronous orbit around Bop would require an altitude outside its SOI. — Elembis (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2013 (CST)
"Bop gains its shape of a brown crunched up ball of paper is caused by its low gravity" Can someone tidy this up? There are a few sentences that make no sense, and i don't even know what the quoted one is saying?Kahlzun (talk) 01:52, 3 March 2013 (CST)