Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbol System/Table"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(seconds)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:i was planning on making something like that, so it can just be a bunch of <nowiki>{{tablerow|moho}}s</nowiki>. do you think it would be better for this to be Kerbol System/Table and then make Kerbol System/Table/Row, or have the row template just be a subpage of Kerbol System and put the table directly on the page?  it's all manual for now because i just wanted to plan out how it would look.
 
:i was planning on making something like that, so it can just be a bunch of <nowiki>{{tablerow|moho}}s</nowiki>. do you think it would be better for this to be Kerbol System/Table and then make Kerbol System/Table/Row, or have the row template just be a subpage of Kerbol System and put the table directly on the page?  it's all manual for now because i just wanted to plan out how it would look.
 
:i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
 
:i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
 +
::I would go for ''/Table/Row''. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 17:52, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
 +
 +
----
 +
do we really need the raw seconds display in the periods?  seems pretty unnecessary to me, especially since this is meant to just be an overview.  --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 01:50, 3 September 2013 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 06:50, 3 September 2013

A few notes

As you don't wish that other edit there a few notes:

  • Why not additionally a template like Kerbol System/Row which handles one row. So you call here only all rows.
  • Aren't planets a satellite of their star (Kerbol in KSP)?

But the first look is nice (considering it is not complete). — xZise [talk] 16:35, 22 August 2013 (CDT)

i was planning on making something like that, so it can just be a bunch of {{tablerow|moho}}s. do you think it would be better for this to be Kerbol System/Table and then make Kerbol System/Table/Row, or have the row template just be a subpage of Kerbol System and put the table directly on the page? it's all manual for now because i just wanted to plan out how it would look.
i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --ant () 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
I would go for /Table/Row. — xZise [talk] 17:52, 22 August 2013 (CDT)

do we really need the raw seconds display in the periods? seems pretty unnecessary to me, especially since this is meant to just be an overview. --ant () 01:50, 3 September 2013 (CDT)