Difference between revisions of "User talk:Onco p53"
(→Are you (partially) a bot?) |
(→Are you (partially) a bot?) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Are you (partially) a bot? == | == Are you (partially) a bot? == | ||
Hi, this question seems odd, but the amount and rapidity of edits it seems like you are an bot. If so, you should request a bot flag from [[User:ALeXmOrA]]. This doesn't mean your edits are not welcome, but they are spamming [[Special:RecentChanges]] a lot so quickly looking through the edits of other editors isn't that easy (and I like to do that from time to time to check if they are legit). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | Hi, this question seems odd, but the amount and rapidity of edits it seems like you are an bot. If so, you should request a bot flag from [[User:ALeXmOrA]]. This doesn't mean your edits are not welcome, but they are spamming [[Special:RecentChanges]] a lot so quickly looking through the edits of other editors isn't that easy (and I like to do that from time to time to check if they are legit). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
| − | :Hi, no I am not a bot ;-), but I do use the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] software which greatly speeds editing by autoloading pages and suggesting edits. They have to be manually confirmed though. I understand about spamming the recent changes page though, but my edits should be less frequent in the future. It is a pity you can't filter by user. [[User:Onco p53|Onco p53]] ([[User talk:Onco p53|talk]]) 07:06, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | + | :Hi, no I am not a bot ;-), but I do use the [[w:Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] software which greatly speeds editing by autoloading pages and suggesting edits. They have to be manually confirmed though. I understand about spamming the recent changes page though, but my edits should be less frequent in the future. It is a pity you can't filter by user. [[User:Onco p53|Onco p53]] ([[User talk:Onco p53|talk]]) 07:06, 8 April 2014 (CDT) |
| + | ::Ah I guessed that if it wasn't a bot, that it is some kind of helper. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 08:40, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
== Orphaned and uncategorised pages == | == Orphaned and uncategorised pages == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Special:UncategorizedPages]] | * [[Special:UncategorizedPages]] | ||
So at least [[:Category:Orphaned articles]] and especially [[:Category:Uncategorized]] are not necessary. I'm not sure how exactly the MediaWiki software treated that, but I guess articles in [[:Category:Uncategorized]] are not in [[Special:UncategorizedPages]], because they are in a category. The templates can stay (if they don't automatically add the category), or there is a way to tell that a category shouldn't count as categorised. And [[:Category:Articles with too few wikilinks]] seems fine, as it doesn't look like there is an equivalent in [[Special:SpecialPages]]. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | So at least [[:Category:Orphaned articles]] and especially [[:Category:Uncategorized]] are not necessary. I'm not sure how exactly the MediaWiki software treated that, but I guess articles in [[:Category:Uncategorized]] are not in [[Special:UncategorizedPages]], because they are in a category. The templates can stay (if they don't automatically add the category), or there is a way to tell that a category shouldn't count as categorised. And [[:Category:Articles with too few wikilinks]] seems fine, as it doesn't look like there is an equivalent in [[Special:SpecialPages]]. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I mostly agree here, I'll reply properly tomorrow, it is midnight here in New Zealand, and I need to get to bed! [[User:Onco p53|Onco p53]] ([[User talk:Onco p53|talk]]) 07:08, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
== Modules == | == Modules == | ||
Unfortunately this wiki does not support Lua modules like Wikipedia does. I noticed that, when I deleted your Ambox template. By the way I designed {{Tl|Box}} like the [[w:Template:Ambox|Template:Ambox]] before it switched to a Lua module. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | Unfortunately this wiki does not support Lua modules like Wikipedia does. I noticed that, when I deleted your Ambox template. By the way I designed {{Tl|Box}} like the [[w:Template:Ambox|Template:Ambox]] before it switched to a Lua module. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 8 April 2014
Are you (partially) a bot?
Hi, this question seems odd, but the amount and rapidity of edits it seems like you are an bot. If so, you should request a bot flag from User:ALeXmOrA. This doesn't mean your edits are not welcome, but they are spamming Special:RecentChanges a lot so quickly looking through the edits of other editors isn't that easy (and I like to do that from time to time to check if they are legit). — xZise [talk] 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT)
- Hi, no I am not a bot ;-), but I do use the AWB software which greatly speeds editing by autoloading pages and suggesting edits. They have to be manually confirmed though. I understand about spamming the recent changes page though, but my edits should be less frequent in the future. It is a pity you can't filter by user. Onco p53 (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2014 (CDT)
Orphaned and uncategorised pages
Hi, there are already special pages which list you orphaned pages:
So at least Category:Orphaned articles and especially Category:Uncategorized are not necessary. I'm not sure how exactly the MediaWiki software treated that, but I guess articles in Category:Uncategorized are not in Special:UncategorizedPages, because they are in a category. The templates can stay (if they don't automatically add the category), or there is a way to tell that a category shouldn't count as categorised. And Category:Articles with too few wikilinks seems fine, as it doesn't look like there is an equivalent in Special:SpecialPages. — xZise [talk] 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT)
- I mostly agree here, I'll reply properly tomorrow, it is midnight here in New Zealand, and I need to get to bed! Onco p53 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2014 (CDT)
Modules
Unfortunately this wiki does not support Lua modules like Wikipedia does. I noticed that, when I deleted your Ambox template. By the way I designed {{Box}} like the Template:Ambox before it switched to a Lua module. — xZise [talk] 06:44, 8 April 2014 (CDT)
