Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stats Table Command Pods"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(→Enhancing) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | 1 - 3 {{mark|crew}} would be better, but the | + | 1 - 3 {{mark|crew}} would be better, but the sortcell hates to be second... |
the {{mark|echu}}/h used for avoiding the sorting mess with the crew values. | the {{mark|echu}}/h used for avoiding the sorting mess with the crew values. | ||
[[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 04:49, 23 September 2014 (CDT) | [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 04:49, 23 September 2014 (CDT) | ||
:You can add the sorting information manually. And I actually thought it was a joke that you call it shortcell(ed) and not sortcell. See also [[w:Help:Sorting#Specifying a sort key for a cell]]. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:55, 23 September 2014 (CDT) | :You can add the sorting information manually. And I actually thought it was a joke that you call it shortcell(ed) and not sortcell. See also [[w:Help:Sorting#Specifying a sort key for a cell]]. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:55, 23 September 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::I'd made a special sorting template. Of course called "ShortCell". It shorts and it's invisible. Now probe-cores (sorting order by power) - 1 - 2 - 3 {{mark|crew}} [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 08:53, 28 September 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::You mean {{Tl|SortCell}} and not {{Tl|ShortCell}}. And I'm completetly fine with using 'Sort' and not 'Short' because it doesn't matter if it's [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/short shorting] something (because that is what templates do) but it's adding a [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sort sort] key. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 09:11, 28 September 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::Autch! Sortcell - I'll write 100 times as penalty... <small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NWM|contribs]]) 15:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
| + | :::::With that in mind also more reliable signatures? :D — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 17:49, 4 October 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Enhancing == | ||
| + | # Drag is not essential anymore - may it be deleted? | ||
| + | # Adding SAS level? (none<>0<>kerbal !) | ||
| + | # Adding manned, unmanned switches? - [[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 15:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Well the first point applies to many more tables. I'm not sure if they don't apply anymore. There is still a value in the part configuration (but that doesn't mean anything). And the real-world formula has also a drag coefficient like this one. The ''only'' difference between the real-world formula and KSP's aerodynamics before 1.0 were that the cross-sectional area was guessed via the mass and not actually the shape. | ||
| + | :There is already information regarding crewed/robotic in the second to last column. I don't think we should add a column to make this more explicit as the table is already relatively wide. But maybe we can/should add the SAS capabilities. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 18:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 3 May 2015
1 - 3 
would be better, but the sortcell hates to be second...
the ⚡/h used for avoiding the sorting mess with the crew values.
NWM (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2014 (CDT)
- You can add the sorting information manually. And I actually thought it was a joke that you call it shortcell(ed) and not sortcell. See also w:Help:Sorting#Specifying a sort key for a cell. — xZise [talk] 05:55, 23 September 2014 (CDT)
- I'd made a special sorting template. Of course called "ShortCell". It shorts and it's invisible. Now probe-cores (sorting order by power) - 1 - 2 - 3 NWM (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2014 (CDT)
- I'd made a special sorting template. Of course called "ShortCell". It shorts and it's invisible. Now probe-cores (sorting order by power) - 1 - 2 - 3
Enhancing
- Drag is not essential anymore - may it be deleted?
- Adding SAS level? (none<>0<>kerbal !)
- Adding manned, unmanned switches? - NWM (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well the first point applies to many more tables. I'm not sure if they don't apply anymore. There is still a value in the part configuration (but that doesn't mean anything). And the real-world formula has also a drag coefficient like this one. The only difference between the real-world formula and KSP's aerodynamics before 1.0 were that the cross-sectional area was guessed via the mass and not actually the shape.
- There is already information regarding crewed/robotic in the second to last column. I don't think we should add a column to make this more explicit as the table is already relatively wide. But maybe we can/should add the SAS capabilities. — xZise [talk] 18:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
