Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cargo bay"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(→Atmospheric effects) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:PS: I don't believe if each picture needs comment...[[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 11:01, 10 November 2014 (CST) | :PS: I don't believe if each picture needs comment...[[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 11:01, 10 November 2014 (CST) | ||
::Is there a difference with the craft without the cargobay part? Maybe your parachute is so dominant that the other parts don't matter. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:50, 10 November 2014 (CST) | ::Is there a difference with the craft without the cargobay part? Maybe your parachute is so dominant that the other parts don't matter. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:50, 10 November 2014 (CST) | ||
| + | :::There is no measurable difference between the configurations.[[User:NWM|NWM]] ([[User talk:NWM|talk]]) 16:10, 10 November 2014 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:10, 10 November 2014
Atmospheric effects
Hi, I thought some dev was talking about that the atmospheric simulation has to be rewritten for cargo bays but I can't find it. Maybe I've misread it. But I've done some tests today with weird results, and I'm not sure how to interpret them: http://imgur.com/a/Z9Fu4 — xZise [talk] 09:32, 10 November 2014 (CST)
- Hi, XZise! I've created a "hyper-efficient-micro-drought-parachute" (a little part, m=1t d=1000) and used to brake the craft on the runaway. The top speed was same: out of the cargo bay, in the opened cargo bay, in the closed cargo bay.
- PS: I don't believe if each picture needs comment...NWM (talk) 11:01, 10 November 2014 (CST)
