Difference between revisions of "Talk:Version history"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
m (XZise moved page Talk:Version History to Talk:Version history without leaving a redirect: remove the uppercased letter) |
(→Style of the early releases: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
All the preceding waypoints, flagpoints, kerbals, etc, on the Mun from the successfully converted previous save are 3-6km under the surface. I was using this to guage a dark-side landing, and crashed because I thought I had another 4k remaining. :( | All the preceding waypoints, flagpoints, kerbals, etc, on the Mun from the successfully converted previous save are 3-6km under the surface. I was using this to guage a dark-side landing, and crashed because I thought I had another 4k remaining. :( | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Style of the early releases == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, currently all „modern“ releases are unchanged when a new version is released. Now with the additions of the early versions, there is a break in style as they are stated in past tense. Should the early releases be rewritten to make them like the newer entries to remain consistent? — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 10:47, 3 March 2014 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 3 March 2014
Errm, i'm not getting the Ion jets, is this a removal or a one-off glitch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoform (talk • contribs)
All the preceding waypoints, flagpoints, kerbals, etc, on the Mun from the successfully converted previous save are 3-6km under the surface. I was using this to guage a dark-side landing, and crashed because I thought I had another 4k remaining. :(
Style of the early releases
Hi, currently all „modern“ releases are unchanged when a new version is released. Now with the additions of the early versions, there is a break in style as they are stated in past tense. Should the early releases be rewritten to make them like the newer entries to remain consistent? — xZise [talk] 10:47, 3 March 2014 (CST)
