Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Celestials"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) (→Moons should be under the planets) |
Thecoshman (talk | contribs) m (changed formatting of comments) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I personally think the page should not have these images included like it currently does; they take up a large portion of the page and do not add to it. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 10:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | I personally think the page should not have these images included like it currently does; they take up a large portion of the page and do not add to it. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 10:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | + | : I think they should remain, if somebody can figure out how to display them horizontally it would look great, and serve as a scale model of the solar system.--[[User:Craigmt1|Craigmt1]] ([[User talk:Craigmt1|talk]]) 15:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | |
− | + | :: You mean like it now is on the main page? [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 08:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | |
== Moons should be under the planets == | == Moons should be under the planets == |
Revision as of 16:47, 28 September 2012
Removal of Images
I personally think the page should not have these images included like it currently does; they take up a large portion of the page and do not add to it. Thecoshman (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think they should remain, if somebody can figure out how to display them horizontally it would look great, and serve as a scale model of the solar system.--Craigmt1 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- You mean like it now is on the main page? Thecoshman (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Moons should be under the planets
The moons currently have no realtion to the planets they order, they should either be removed from the diagram, or arranged so that they form columns beneath the planet. Thecoshman (talk) 07:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed this all on my own, man wiki tables are crazy. Thecoshman (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)