Difference between revisions of "Talk:LV-N Atomic Rocket Engine"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(→Bug?: new section) |
(→Bug?: --possible explanation) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey, can somebody explain what [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=LV-N_Atomic_Rocket_Engine&diff=14139&oldid=14049 this edit] means? According to the part data, the efficiency is in vacuum almost 4 times better. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small valign="middle">[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:43, 20 April 2013 (CDT) | Hey, can somebody explain what [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=LV-N_Atomic_Rocket_Engine&diff=14139&oldid=14049 this edit] means? According to the part data, the efficiency is in vacuum almost 4 times better. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small valign="middle">[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 05:43, 20 April 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I think he means it provides less output, but by my math that shouldn't be the case either. It may consume less fuel, but not so much less fuel that it is providing less total thrust --[[User:Ruedii|Ruedii]] ([[User talk:Ruedii|talk]]) 18:19, 2 May 2013 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 2 May 2013
Bug?
Hey, can somebody explain what this edit means? According to the part data, the efficiency is in vacuum almost 4 times better. — xZise [talk] 05:43, 20 April 2013 (CDT)
