Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mk2-R Radial-Mount Parachute"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Einsteiner (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Because of the way the drag coefficient is calculated, the 50% greater mass of the radial chute gives it 50% more drag than the Mk16 parachute, so one isn't preferred over the other. --einsteiner | Because of the way the drag coefficient is calculated, the 50% greater mass of the radial chute gives it 50% more drag than the Mk16 parachute, so one isn't preferred over the other. --einsteiner | ||
:Hi looks about right. Although you need to account for other parts additional to the parachute like the Mk1-2 Command Pod. It gives you a drag coefficient of either 18.2650602 (Mk2-R) or 12.3902439 (Mk16) which is about 67 % the drag of the Mk2-R. (PS: sign with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> and it will also add time and date of your comment) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 03:22, 29 August 2013 (CDT) | :Hi looks about right. Although you need to account for other parts additional to the parachute like the Mk1-2 Command Pod. It gives you a drag coefficient of either 18.2650602 (Mk2-R) or 12.3902439 (Mk16) which is about 67 % the drag of the Mk2-R. (PS: sign with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> and it will also add time and date of your comment) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 03:22, 29 August 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Thanks for the signature tip. Since terminal velocity only depends on drag coefficent, it is the mass of parachutes you have, not any one specifically. In [http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/31405-Parachute-guidelines this] forum thread ThePsuedoMonkey generated some nice plots of terminal velocity vs the fraction of your craft that is parachutes (by mass). It's sobering to realize you need 3 tons of parachutes to safely land a 10 ton booster! --[[User:Einsteiner|Einsteiner]] ([[User talk:Einsteiner|talk]]) 14:24, 29 August 2013 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 29 August 2013
More drag through more mass
Because of the way the drag coefficient is calculated, the 50% greater mass of the radial chute gives it 50% more drag than the Mk16 parachute, so one isn't preferred over the other. --einsteiner
- Hi looks about right. Although you need to account for other parts additional to the parachute like the Mk1-2 Command Pod. It gives you a drag coefficient of either 18.2650602 (Mk2-R) or 12.3902439 (Mk16) which is about 67 % the drag of the Mk2-R. (PS: sign with --~~~~ and it will also add time and date of your comment) — xZise [talk] 03:22, 29 August 2013 (CDT)
- Thanks for the signature tip. Since terminal velocity only depends on drag coefficent, it is the mass of parachutes you have, not any one specifically. In this forum thread ThePsuedoMonkey generated some nice plots of terminal velocity vs the fraction of your craft that is parachutes (by mass). It's sobering to realize you need 3 tons of parachutes to safely land a 10 ton booster! --Einsteiner (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2013 (CDT)
