Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbol System/Table"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(→A few notes) |
(seconds) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT) | :i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT) | ||
::I would go for ''/Table/Row''. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 17:52, 22 August 2013 (CDT) | ::I would go for ''/Table/Row''. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 17:52, 22 August 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | do we really need the raw seconds display in the periods? seems pretty unnecessary to me, especially since this is meant to just be an overview. --[[User:Ant|ant]] ([[User talk:Ant|☎]]) 01:50, 3 September 2013 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:50, 3 September 2013
A few notes
As you don't wish that other edit there a few notes:
- Why not additionally a template like Kerbol System/Row which handles one row. So you call here only all rows.
- Aren't planets a satellite of their star (Kerbol in KSP)?
But the first look is nice (considering it is not complete). — xZise [talk] 16:35, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
- i was planning on making something like that, so it can just be a bunch of {{tablerow|moho}}s. do you think it would be better for this to be Kerbol System/Table and then make Kerbol System/Table/Row, or have the row template just be a subpage of Kerbol System and put the table directly on the page? it's all manual for now because i just wanted to plan out how it would look.
- i suppose they are satellites, but it seems silly to have that column say "kerbol" a bunch of times. i'm considering denoting parent bodies in some other, cleaner, way. --ant (☎) 16:49, 22 August 2013 (CDT)
do we really need the raw seconds display in the periods? seems pretty unnecessary to me, especially since this is meant to just be an overview. --ant (☎) 01:50, 3 September 2013 (CDT)
