Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mk1 Inline Cockpit"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
THEMUNROVER (talk | contribs) (→Outdated template: Correcting myself again) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I edited this to look similar to the MK1 - still needs part.cfg , since version info. and maybe some other minute details | + | I edited this to look similar to the MK1 - still needs part.cfg , since version info. and maybe some other minute details <small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zyziz|Zyziz]] ([[User talk:Zyziz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zyziz|contribs]]) 02:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)</small> |
== Outdated template == | == Outdated template == | ||
What exactly is outdated here? --[[User:THEMUNROVER|THEMUNROVER]] 12:39, 22 October 2014 | What exactly is outdated here? --[[User:THEMUNROVER|THEMUNROVER]] 12:39, 22 October 2014 | ||
| + | :I think this was added when Squad renamed ASAS into SAS and SAS into reaction wheel and they changed most of the torque values. The infoboxes then were all outdated due to that but in theory this isn't such large problem anymore as I can run now a bot which basically generates the infoboxes from the part.cfg (not perfect but good enough). You could look in the version history to see when it was added (if it was around the time I mentioned) and remove it in that case if you don't see anything outdated (or add a description what you think is outdated). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 19:33, 22 October 2014 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:33, 23 October 2014
I edited this to look similar to the MK1 - still needs part.cfg , since version info. and maybe some other minute details — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zyziz (talk • contribs) 02:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Outdated template
What exactly is outdated here? --THEMUNROVER 12:39, 22 October 2014
- I think this was added when Squad renamed ASAS into SAS and SAS into reaction wheel and they changed most of the torque values. The infoboxes then were all outdated due to that but in theory this isn't such large problem anymore as I can run now a bot which basically generates the infoboxes from the part.cfg (not perfect but good enough). You could look in the version history to see when it was added (if it was around the time I mentioned) and remove it in that case if you don't see anything outdated (or add a description what you think is outdated). — xZise [talk] 19:33, 22 October 2014 (CDT)
