Difference between revisions of "User:AboveSky"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(FAR: comparative analysis of aerodynamic) |
(+) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
FAR: comparative analysis of aerodynamic parts: | FAR: comparative analysis of aerodynamic parts: | ||
+ | i've test lastest MJ, with different parts, all we know that nocone is flying like brick in KSP w/FAR, but what exactly 'aerodynamic part' are better than the other? | ||
− | Small: | + | '''Small:''' (Rocomax 48-7S; 2 Oscar-B Fuel Tanks; Z-200; SRW; OKTO2; MechJeb 1 left) |
− | + | Caps | |
1. StayPutnik Mk1 12400m | 1. StayPutnik Mk1 12400m | ||
− | 2. | + | 2. Standart NoseCone 11400m |
+ | 3. Parachute Mk16 9600m | ||
+ | 4. NoCone: 4240m | ||
+ | '''Medium:''' | ||
+ | 1. Circular intake | ||
+ | 2. Clampotron Shielded | ||
+ | 3. AeroDynamyc NoseCone | ||
− | + | '''Large:''' | |
− | + | ||
+ | Page is under construction. |
Revision as of 13:09, 19 January 2015
FAR: comparative analysis of aerodynamic parts:
i've test lastest MJ, with different parts, all we know that nocone is flying like brick in KSP w/FAR, but what exactly 'aerodynamic part' are better than the other?
Small: (Rocomax 48-7S; 2 Oscar-B Fuel Tanks; Z-200; SRW; OKTO2; MechJeb 1 left) Caps 1. StayPutnik Mk1 12400m 2. Standart NoseCone 11400m 3. Parachute Mk16 9600m 4. NoCone: 4240m
Medium:
1. Circular intake
2. Clampotron Shielded
3. AeroDynamyc NoseCone
Large:
Page is under construction.