Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbol"
m (→Dutch link: and what would a contribution be if i didnt forget my signature...) |
(→Kerbol: new section) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Could somebody link up the Dutch language Kerbol Page to this one like the Russian one is done???--[[User:Azivegu|Azivegu]] ([[User talk:Azivegu|talk]]) 19:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) | Could somebody link up the Dutch language Kerbol Page to this one like the Russian one is done???--[[User:Azivegu|Azivegu]] ([[User talk:Azivegu|talk]]) 19:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Kerbol == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Though it probably is indeed a K-class, it may also be a white dwarf. If Kerbol actually existed, it would be a T or Y class brown dwarf, because no star that small can undergo nuclear fusion.--[[User:Mocha2007|Mocha2007]] ([[User talk:Mocha2007|talk]]) 22:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:25, 28 October 2012
I know the sun has been called kerbol for a long time, but ingame, it is simply 'the sun'. Kerbol only exists in the memories of old timers. This should be mentioned here.
Contents
M class? More like K...
Based upon the distance to Kerbin, to have earth-like temperatures the star would need to be a low K class minimum. K class stars are still red, so just because 'Red Dwarf' is commonly associated with M class doesn't mean that all red dwarfs are M class.
Just saying, I think it's more likely that kerbol is a K class Main sequence star (KnV, where n is either 6,7, or 8.) --Mocha2007 (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- I have been doing some crude maths of my own on this, and based on the Mass of Kerbol and thus the Luminosity, I see this as being something more like high G, around 8 or 9. Though it does look like it is a very small star for such mass and luminosity. Though This is based of of the mass and radius given from this wiki, which I do not know how accurate they are. Thecoshman (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Use of Planet Box
As the very name suggest, the planet box is for planets, much of the information it would contain is 'N/A' when dealing with stars. Could someone with a better mastery of templates make a more applicable 'star box'. It may seem a bit redundant for the now, but I dare say eventually inter-stellar travel will be possible. Thecoshman (talk) 08:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Expression Error: Unexpected < Operator
Ok... I wanted to change the class of Kerbol form star to K-Class Star. It worked, but in bright red letters popped the message: "Expression Error: Unexpected < Operator". So like the good person i am, i reverted my changes, but it stayed. I think it has something to do with the Orbital Period Hours. Anybody know what the heck is going on???--Azivegu (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Dutch link
Could somebody link up the Dutch language Kerbol Page to this one like the Russian one is done???--Azivegu (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kerbol
Though it probably is indeed a K-class, it may also be a white dwarf. If Kerbol actually existed, it would be a T or Y class brown dwarf, because no star that small can undergo nuclear fusion.--Mocha2007 (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC)