User talk:XZise/Archives/2014/03
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
< User talk:XZise
Revision as of 13:30, 28 April 2014 by RoboJeb (talk | contribs) (Robot: Archiving 3 threads from User talk:XZise.)
I's Sorry
I'm sorry, I'm just an update, just as a joke. Confusing sorry got side.ysjbserver 05:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- For what ever reason you did that, it's “okay” (as in you won't be blocked) as it didn't broke anything and it was the only incident. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)
Notice from the original writer of the Oxygen page
I'd like to thank you for imporving upon my work, it is much appreciated. Thanks, -LiquidLight 08:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I try to preserve as much as possible without annoying the original authors. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)
Infobox concept
Hi, I did get confused which system was the one to go for; I think I actually already changed one or two the wrong way around. So it looks like we're using Infobox/Part | data |more={{ additional items }}, right?
Very new to Wiki editing, is this the right way to respond or should I have edited your talk msg?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniu (talk • contribs) 13:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm actually not sure which is the best way. I usually response below the message to have a flow for other readers. But positing on the others one talk page will notify the user.
- Now actually they are transitioning to the sytem using the more parameter, because that easily allow constructs like R.A.P.I.E.R. Engine/Box where there are two different types of infoboxes (without always creating a new one every time). A little discussion is at Template talk:Infobox/Part#Rework the template?. Unfortunately not all templates can be converted yet (but liquid fuel engines and command modules should work fine).
- And yes you actually reverted one of my changes, but that not a problem. I fixed that quickly (and that's one of the reasons I contacted you, so you know why I reverted your changes once).
- Also the <noinclude>{{Data template used}}</noinclude> is simply to tell others that it is not a real article, which for example happend here. — xZise [talk] 08:51, 27 March 2014 (CDT)