Template talk:Stats Table Command Pods

1 - 3 would be better, but the sortcell hates to be second... the ⚡/h used for avoiding the sorting mess with the crew values. NWM (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2014 (CDT)

You can add the sorting information manually. And I actually thought it was a joke that you call it shortcell(ed) and not sortcell. See also w:Help:Sorting#Specifying a sort key for a cell. — xZise [talk] 05:55, 23 September 2014 (CDT)

I'd made a special sorting template. Of course called "ShortCell". It shorts and it's invisible. Now probe-cores (sorting order by power) - 1 - 2 - 3 NWM (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2014 (CDT)

You mean {{SortCell}} and not {{ShortCell}}. And I'm completetly fine with using 'Sort' and not 'Short' because it doesn't matter if it's shorting something (because that is what templates do) but it's adding a sort key. — xZise [talk] 09:11, 28 September 2014 (CDT)

Autch! Sortcell - I'll write 100 times as penalty... — Preceding unsigned comment added by NWM (talk • contribs) 15:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

With that in mind also more reliable signatures? :D — xZise [talk] 17:49, 4 October 2014 (CDT)

Enhancing

1. Drag is not essential anymore - may it be deleted?
2. Adding SAS level? (none<>0<>kerbal !)
3. Adding manned, unmanned switches? - NWM (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Well the first point applies to many more tables. I'm not sure if they don't apply anymore. There is still a value in the part configuration (but that doesn't mean anything). And the real-world formula has also a drag coefficient like this one. The only difference between the real-world formula and KSP's aerodynamics before 1.0 were that the cross-sectional area was guessed via the mass and not actually the shape.

There is already information regarding crewed/robotic in the second to last column. I don't think we should add a column to make this more explicit as the table is already relatively wide. But maybe we can/should add the SAS capabilities. — xZise [talk] 18:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)