Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deep Space Kraken"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Does this count as a stub?)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
::Yeah, I think making the Kraken to be more like a story element / reason why shit breaks is a lot better then trying to make it out as one particular bug. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 18:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 
::Yeah, I think making the Kraken to be more like a story element / reason why shit breaks is a lot better then trying to make it out as one particular bug. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 18:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
Threw in a picture of a Kerbal being affected by the Kraken's influence.--[[User:Boinciel|Boinciel]] ([[User talk:Boinciel|talk]]) 12:42, 23 April 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 17:42, 23 April 2013

Does this count as a stub?

I don't think it does. Sure this article is short, but what more can you really say about this. Potentially, you could move this page to be just a section in some sort of terminology page, but I think it justifies its own page. Thecoshman (talk) 09:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

The problem is that it seems Squad has, in the past, jokingly referred to *all* bugs as "the work of the Kraken", while the community seems intent on narrowing it down to one bug, giving all the others a variety of names. Each specific short-lived bug having it's own specific name is going to cause a lot of confusion down the road.
I say we expand the Kraken to refer to any kind of unexplained anomaly that destroys your ship so we can actually expand on this article.--Craigmt1 (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I think making the Kraken to be more like a story element / reason why shit breaks is a lot better then trying to make it out as one particular bug. Thecoshman (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Threw in a picture of a Kerbal being affected by the Kraken's influence.--Boinciel (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2013 (CDT)