Difference between revisions of "Talk:GRAVMAX Negative Gravioli Detector"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Principle of equivalence== "The fact that the GRAVMAX Negative Gravioli Detector gives readings independent of the Double-C Seismic Accelerometer shows that the principle o...")
 
(Principle of equivalence)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
This has been bothering me for a while. The two sensors are made to measure two things -the Gravmax is a gravitometer and the Double-C is an accelerometer- so their readings will be different. Whether this is true or not it doesn't need to be in the article as it's not about the Gravmax. Should it be added, there should be a different section about it where the information above is expanded. [[User:Nando.sm|Nando.sm]] ([[User talk:Nando.sm|talk]]) 19:16, 15 October 2014 (CDT)
 
This has been bothering me for a while. The two sensors are made to measure two things -the Gravmax is a gravitometer and the Double-C is an accelerometer- so their readings will be different. Whether this is true or not it doesn't need to be in the article as it's not about the Gravmax. Should it be added, there should be a different section about it where the information above is expanded. [[User:Nando.sm|Nando.sm]] ([[User talk:Nando.sm|talk]]) 19:16, 15 October 2014 (CDT)
 +
:Now I didn't really understood the science behind it, but if that is valid I don't see a reason why it should be deleted. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 06:47, 18 October 2014 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:47, 18 October 2014

Principle of equivalence

"The fact that the GRAVMAX Negative Gravioli Detector gives readings independent of the Double-C Seismic Accelerometer shows that the principle of equivalence is invalid in the Kerbol solar system and therefore that Kerbal Space Program's physics is incompatible with general relativity."

This has been bothering me for a while. The two sensors are made to measure two things -the Gravmax is a gravitometer and the Double-C is an accelerometer- so their readings will be different. Whether this is true or not it doesn't need to be in the article as it's not about the Gravmax. Should it be added, there should be a different section about it where the information above is expanded. Nando.sm (talk) 19:16, 15 October 2014 (CDT)

Now I didn't really understood the science behind it, but if that is valid I don't see a reason why it should be deleted. — xZise [talk] 06:47, 18 October 2014 (CDT)