Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbol"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I know the sun has been called kerbol for a long time, but ingame, it is simply 'the sun'. Kerbol only exists in the memories of old timers. This should be mentioned here.")
 
(M class? More like K...: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I know the sun has been called kerbol for a long time, but ingame, it is simply 'the sun'.  Kerbol only exists in the memories of old timers.  This should be mentioned here.
 
I know the sun has been called kerbol for a long time, but ingame, it is simply 'the sun'.  Kerbol only exists in the memories of old timers.  This should be mentioned here.
 +
 +
== M class? More like K... ==
 +
 +
Based upon the distance to Kerbin, to have earth-like temperatures the star would need to be a low K class minimum. K class stars are still red, so just because 'Red Dwarf' is commonly associated with M class doesn't mean that all red dwarfs are M class.
 +
 +
Just saying, I think it's more likely that kerbol is a K class Main sequence star (KnV, where n is either 6,7, or 8.) --[[User:Mocha2007|Mocha2007]] ([[User talk:Mocha2007|talk]]) 16:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:05, 18 September 2012

I know the sun has been called kerbol for a long time, but ingame, it is simply 'the sun'. Kerbol only exists in the memories of old timers. This should be mentioned here.

M class? More like K...

Based upon the distance to Kerbin, to have earth-like temperatures the star would need to be a low K class minimum. K class stars are still red, so just because 'Red Dwarf' is commonly associated with M class doesn't mean that all red dwarfs are M class.

Just saying, I think it's more likely that kerbol is a K class Main sequence star (KnV, where n is either 6,7, or 8.) --Mocha2007 (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)