Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tutorial:Whats with all the math?"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ""TWR of exactly one will not make the rocket hover in place" Will not? I think you mean, it _will_. But I haven't tested this. So maybe somebody can confirm it for me?")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== TWR 1 won't hover? ==
 
"TWR of exactly one will not make the rocket hover in place"
 
"TWR of exactly one will not make the rocket hover in place"
  
 
Will not? I think you mean, it _will_.
 
Will not? I think you mean, it _will_.
  
But I haven't tested this. So maybe somebody can confirm it for me?
+
But I haven't tested this. So maybe somebody can confirm it for me?<small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TerryDactyl|TerryDactyl]] ([[User talk:TerryDactyl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TerryDactyl|contribs]]) 18:04, 27 February 2015‎ (UTC)</small>
 +
:Yes that is the idea behind the TWR. If the thrust and weight are exactly the same their ratio is 1 and with both being exactly the same the net force is 0 (for the TWR only the thrust part pointing towards the surface is counted). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 05:43, 28 February 2015 (CST)

Revision as of 11:43, 28 February 2015

TWR 1 won't hover?

"TWR of exactly one will not make the rocket hover in place"

Will not? I think you mean, it _will_.

But I haven't tested this. So maybe somebody can confirm it for me?— Preceding unsigned comment added by TerryDactyl (talkcontribs) 18:04, 27 February 2015‎ (UTC)

Yes that is the idea behind the TWR. If the thrust and weight are exactly the same their ratio is 1 and with both being exactly the same the net force is 0 (for the TWR only the thrust part pointing towards the surface is counted). — xZise [talk] 05:43, 28 February 2015 (CST)