Difference between revisions of "User talk:XZise"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Spoiler Template)
(Terminal velocity - chart on Atmosphere: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Hello XZise. I noticed that you seem to know your way around MediaWiki syntax. Could you create a "spoiler" template for the wiki which hides content until the user clicks on it? That would be very useful for hiding information about easter eggs, like some of the screenshots on the page about [[Mün]]. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 08:38, 7 March 2013 (CST)
 
Hello XZise. I noticed that you seem to know your way around MediaWiki syntax. Could you create a "spoiler" template for the wiki which hides content until the user clicks on it? That would be very useful for hiding information about easter eggs, like some of the screenshots on the page about [[Mün]]. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 08:38, 7 March 2013 (CST)
 +
 +
== Terminal velocity - chart on [[Atmosphere]] ==
 +
 +
Thanks for fixing it!  The many Kerbals that would otherwise have died trying to fudge that value experimentally are most grateful!  (They will, more likely than not, be headed for a much more creative death now... for the sake of science, of course.)
 +
 +
-- [[User:Joren|'''J'''oren]] ([[User talk:Joren|talk]]) 16:51, 27 March 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:51, 27 March 2013

Planetbox templates

Thanks a lot for your work on Template:Planetbox and related templates! It's really nice to have them cleaned up so that they no longer require redundant information. — Elembis (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2013 (CST)

Spoiler Template

Hello XZise. I noticed that you seem to know your way around MediaWiki syntax. Could you create a "spoiler" template for the wiki which hides content until the user clicks on it? That would be very useful for hiding information about easter eggs, like some of the screenshots on the page about Mün. --Crush (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2013 (CST)

Terminal velocity - chart on Atmosphere

Thanks for fixing it! The many Kerbals that would otherwise have died trying to fudge that value experimentally are most grateful! (They will, more likely than not, be headed for a much more creative death now... for the sake of science, of course.)

-- Joren (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2013 (CDT)