Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Airfield"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Location Name)
(Location Name)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:That sounds logical. I extracted the content from [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Inland_Kerbal_Space_Center&diff=22870&oldid=20452 Inland Kerbal Space Center]. As the Inland KSC was named second KSC there, it was added as thrid KSC, so the KSC part stuck. If nobody has a better suggestion, or a reason why not to rename, I can do it. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 16:47, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
 
:That sounds logical. I extracted the content from [http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/w/index.php?title=Inland_Kerbal_Space_Center&diff=22870&oldid=20452 Inland Kerbal Space Center]. As the Inland KSC was named second KSC there, it was added as thrid KSC, so the KSC part stuck. If nobody has a better suggestion, or a reason why not to rename, I can do it. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 16:47, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
 
::Totally, sounds like a great idea. &mdash; [[User:Chuzzard|Chuzzard]] ([[User talk:Chuzzard|talk]]) 22:53, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
 
::Totally, sounds like a great idea. &mdash; [[User:Chuzzard|Chuzzard]] ([[User talk:Chuzzard|talk]]) 22:53, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
 +
::Good idea, but "airfield" would be more appropriate IMO. It just has a grass runway (!), a tower and three poorly made hangars - an actual airport has solid (concrete, asphalt) runways and more/bigger/better buildings. --[[User:Dgelessus|dgelessus]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]]&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgelessus|contribs]])</sup> 11:49, 17 August 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:49, 17 August 2013

Location Name

I find the title of this article (Insular Kerbal Space Center) rather misleading. With the present facilities it is definitely closer to an airport than a space center. I propose to rename the article to "Insular airport", unless there is some better or official title for it. --CookieCrunch (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2013 (CDT)

That sounds logical. I extracted the content from Inland Kerbal Space Center. As the Inland KSC was named second KSC there, it was added as thrid KSC, so the KSC part stuck. If nobody has a better suggestion, or a reason why not to rename, I can do it. — xZise [talk] 16:47, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
Totally, sounds like a great idea. — Chuzzard (talk) 22:53, 16 August 2013 (CDT)
Good idea, but "airfield" would be more appropriate IMO. It just has a grass runway (!), a tower and three poorly made hangars - an actual airport has solid (concrete, asphalt) runways and more/bigger/better buildings. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 11:49, 17 August 2013 (CDT)