Difference between revisions of "Talk:Physicsless part"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
m (→Isn't this more like physicsless?: feedback) |
(open Q about Massless vs PhysicsSignificance) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: 2cents - both mass-less and physics-less apply (tags > hierarchy). Maybe describe them as "exception parts". [[User:Donfede|Donfede]] ([[User talk:Donfede|talk]]) 20:50, 24 April 2014 (CDT) | :: 2cents - both mass-less and physics-less apply (tags > hierarchy). Maybe describe them as "exception parts". [[User:Donfede|Donfede]] ([[User talk:Donfede|talk]]) 20:50, 24 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Massless vs PhysicsSignificance ??? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thx [[User:UmbralRaptor|UmbralRaptor]] for the update, differing Massless vs PhysiscSignificance parts (ex: EAS struts). However, could you elaborate a bit more on what exactly this means? Most massless parts, don't show up in the mass total seen in the Map view. How do PhysicsSignificance parts behave differently... [[User:Donfede|Donfede]] ([[User talk:Donfede|talk]]) 08:40, 27 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 27 April 2014
Isn't this more like physicsless?
Hi, I was thinking if we should move the page to something like physic(s?)less. I mean all parts which are massless are also dragless if I understand this correctly. — xZise [talk] 03:10, 23 April 2014 (CDT)
Massless vs PhysicsSignificance ???
Thx UmbralRaptor for the update, differing Massless vs PhysiscSignificance parts (ex: EAS struts). However, could you elaborate a bit more on what exactly this means? Most massless parts, don't show up in the mass total seen in the Map view. How do PhysicsSignificance parts behave differently... Donfede (talk) 08:40, 27 April 2014 (CDT)
