Difference between revisions of "User talk:Geoform"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(→Carrier article) |
(→Carrier article) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Your carrier article is pretty … empty. Please expand it although I don't think there is much to say about carriers what isn't already said in [[w:Aircraft carrier]]. I'll give you a week before I delete the article (29 May 2013). ''Should'' you need more time you can of course explain it here or on my talk page. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:04, 22 May 2013 (CDT) | Your carrier article is pretty … empty. Please expand it although I don't think there is much to say about carriers what isn't already said in [[w:Aircraft carrier]]. I'll give you a week before I delete the article (29 May 2013). ''Should'' you need more time you can of course explain it here or on my talk page. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 14:04, 22 May 2013 (CDT) | ||
:Just wanted to mention someting... maybe this is just my literal interpretation of the word "carrier", but I'd say that a KSP-related carrier would be one craft carrying another one as a payload (like a rocket getting a spaceshuttle into orbit), not a ship for aircraft to land on (which doesn't exist as a hidden object and cannot be possibly built either). In that case the article wouldn't be that pointless, it just needs ''some'' expansion. --[[User:Dgelessus|Dgelessus]] ([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]]) 16:03, 22 May 2013 (CDT) | :Just wanted to mention someting... maybe this is just my literal interpretation of the word "carrier", but I'd say that a KSP-related carrier would be one craft carrying another one as a payload (like a rocket getting a spaceshuttle into orbit), not a ship for aircraft to land on (which doesn't exist as a hidden object and cannot be possibly built either). In that case the article wouldn't be that pointless, it just needs ''some'' expansion. --[[User:Dgelessus|Dgelessus]] ([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]]) 16:03, 22 May 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::You mean like a [[w:Launch vehicle]]? Nevertheless the article must be expanded and as I don't know what to write in an article like this I leave it to you. But only one sentence is … a little bit to less (even for {{Tl|Stub}}). — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 16:37, 22 May 2013 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:37, 22 May 2013
Carrier article
Your carrier article is pretty … empty. Please expand it although I don't think there is much to say about carriers what isn't already said in w:Aircraft carrier. I'll give you a week before I delete the article (29 May 2013). Should you need more time you can of course explain it here or on my talk page. — xZise [talk] 14:04, 22 May 2013 (CDT)
- Just wanted to mention someting... maybe this is just my literal interpretation of the word "carrier", but I'd say that a KSP-related carrier would be one craft carrying another one as a payload (like a rocket getting a spaceshuttle into orbit), not a ship for aircraft to land on (which doesn't exist as a hidden object and cannot be possibly built either). In that case the article wouldn't be that pointless, it just needs some expansion. --Dgelessus (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2013 (CDT)
- You mean like a w:Launch vehicle? Nevertheless the article must be expanded and as I don't know what to write in an article like this I leave it to you. But only one sentence is … a little bit to less (even for {{Stub}}). — xZise [talk] 16:37, 22 May 2013 (CDT)
