Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tutorial:Satellite Coverage"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
m (grammar) |
(→Too much math) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already had to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT) | Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already had to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Yeah, it isn't ready now, and I'm trying to make it easier to read. I also planed to add a few graphics. But I wanted to write it first, so I don't forget about it ;) — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 10:11, 4 June 2013 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 4 June 2013
Too much math
Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already had to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --Crush (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT)
