Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cheat sheet"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Tutorial:Advanced Rocket Design?)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::I've now ''radically'' shortened the article. Obviously lots of information was removed, but most of it were just explanations, which really go under tutorials. It should now be more of a cheat sheet. --[[User:Dgelessus|dgelessus]] <sup>([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Dgelessus|logs]])</sup> 10:09, 28 June 2013 (CDT)
 
::I've now ''radically'' shortened the article. Obviously lots of information was removed, but most of it were just explanations, which really go under tutorials. It should now be more of a cheat sheet. --[[User:Dgelessus|dgelessus]] <sup>([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Dgelessus|logs]])</sup> 10:09, 28 June 2013 (CDT)
  
 
+
== Examples ==
 
We need an example section to help show people how to find values on their own. I recommend each equation have at least one working example. After all, the cheat sheet is in the tutorials section itself. [[User:Inigmatus|Inigmatus]] ([[User talk:Inigmatus|talk]]) 12:33, 3 July 2013 (CDT)
 
We need an example section to help show people how to find values on their own. I recommend each equation have at least one working example. After all, the cheat sheet is in the tutorials section itself. [[User:Inigmatus|Inigmatus]] ([[User talk:Inigmatus|talk]]) 12:33, 3 July 2013 (CDT)
 +
:Why are the examples below all formulas? If I want to know how TWR works, I have to search twice. This way you can also save to describe the same formula twice too. And is there any use of the “simplyfied” versions of the formulas? — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 16:13, 3 July 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:13, 3 July 2013

Tutorial:Advanced Rocket Design?

Doesn't Tutorial:Advanced Rocket Design cover this already? — xZise [talk] 11:20, 25 June 2013 (CDT)

This is supposed to be a cheat sheet where everything is described shortly for quick reference. That is not currently the case though and would require some shortening. BTW, I'm <math>ing the formulas at the moment. --dgelessus (talk · logs) 11:53, 25 June 2013 (CDT)
I've now radically shortened the article. Obviously lots of information was removed, but most of it were just explanations, which really go under tutorials. It should now be more of a cheat sheet. --dgelessus (talk · logs) 10:09, 28 June 2013 (CDT)

Examples

We need an example section to help show people how to find values on their own. I recommend each equation have at least one working example. After all, the cheat sheet is in the tutorials section itself. Inigmatus (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2013 (CDT)

Why are the examples below all formulas? If I want to know how TWR works, I have to search twice. This way you can also save to describe the same formula twice too. And is there any use of the “simplyfied” versions of the formulas? — xZise [talk] 16:13, 3 July 2013 (CDT)