Difference between revisions of "Talk:0.23.5"
(→New system?: new section) |
(→New system?) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
After all versions are in their separate pages (the BobBot could do that) version history would link to [[:Category:Versions]]. The {{Tl|version}} template could, if the version number is at least 0.23.5 as you can directly link to it. The main advantage is, that the version history article is [[Special:LongPages|longest page]] and it gets quite crowed there. If you have suggestions or arguments against that system, note them here. If it doesn't work out the content can be integrated into the version history. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 16:06, 1 April 2014 (CDT) | After all versions are in their separate pages (the BobBot could do that) version history would link to [[:Category:Versions]]. The {{Tl|version}} template could, if the version number is at least 0.23.5 as you can directly link to it. The main advantage is, that the version history article is [[Special:LongPages|longest page]] and it gets quite crowed there. If you have suggestions or arguments against that system, note them here. If it doesn't work out the content can be integrated into the version history. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 16:06, 1 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
| + | This system also allows to link to future versions (e.g. the [[Launch Escape System]] used the infobox which in turn uses the version template) and links to unknown versions are shown as redlinks. For example {{Version|0.19.0}} does work while {{Version|0.19}} does not but both are shown as valid links. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 16:13, 1 April 2014 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:13, 1 April 2014
New system?
Hi, I'm thinking if we should have a page for each version update. The basics:
- When a new version number is known an article is created which redirects to planned features.
- After the version is released it is basically the same as each entry on version history.
After all versions are in their separate pages (the BobBot could do that) version history would link to Category:Versions. The {{version}} template could, if the version number is at least 0.23.5 as you can directly link to it. The main advantage is, that the version history article is longest page and it gets quite crowed there. If you have suggestions or arguments against that system, note them here. If it doesn't work out the content can be integrated into the version history. — xZise [talk] 16:06, 1 April 2014 (CDT) This system also allows to link to future versions (e.g. the Launch Escape System used the infobox which in turn uses the version template) and links to unknown versions are shown as redlinks. For example version 0.19.0 does work while version 0.19 does not but both are shown as valid links. — xZise [talk] 16:13, 1 April 2014 (CDT)
