Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pol"
m (→Personalised name for Probes: *use descriptive name;) |
(→Moderate inclination?: new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:: I will edit the pages now. [[User:R0cketor|R0cketor]] ([[User talk:R0cketor|talk]]) 19:34, 15 February 2013 (CST) | :: I will edit the pages now. [[User:R0cketor|R0cketor]] ([[User talk:R0cketor|talk]]) 19:34, 15 February 2013 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Moderate inclination? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The description of the orbit sounds almost like someone confused Bop and Pol - particularly in the inclination. Bop has an inclination worth calling out, far more so than Pol. Just seemed odd that a 4 degree inclination was worth noting, but a 15 degree one wasn't. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 29 July 2022
Personalised name for Probes
I personally don't believe using personal names for probes (e.g. Pol.A.R Lander, Zephyrius Lander) is quite the best thing for a wiki. When I was a rookie I thought they were special types of ships that came with the game and got quite confused. I believe we should rename these to something like this in the gallery:
A user-created probe that landed on the edge of a ridge.
We can still be humorous in the galleries but not with certain names because this will confuse new players.
R0cketor (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2013 (CST)
- I strongly agree. Please make the edit you suggested. =) — Elembis (talk) 16:51, 14 February 2013 (CST)
Moderate inclination?
The description of the orbit sounds almost like someone confused Bop and Pol - particularly in the inclination. Bop has an inclination worth calling out, far more so than Pol. Just seemed odd that a 4 degree inclination was worth noting, but a 15 degree one wasn't.
