Difference between revisions of "User:Eekee"
(SPACEBAR) |
(So much has changed in so few years.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Insane infrastructure integrator! | Insane infrastructure integrator! | ||
− | I' | + | Almost everything about my KSP skills and practice have changed since I first wrote this page. One thing hasn't: a taste for a class of vehicles I call ''rangers.'' Imagine a roving base with mining, rockets, and enough delta-V for major interplanetary journeys. But with such power, roving is not strictly necessary. A ranger can use its rockets to suborbitally hop from place to place on a world. |
− | + | Well actually, a few things haven't changed. Partularly, I still think exofactories are the future, so much so that I refuse to do interplanetary missions without mining. I admire such missions as feats of skill, but I don't think them worth my time and effort, with 2 exceptions. Ion engines have a high enough delta-V, and I have 1 or 2 ideas for minimalist missions which, if they are even possible, would be remarkable things not already demonstrated by others. |
Latest revision as of 09:53, 4 March 2022
Insane infrastructure integrator!
Almost everything about my KSP skills and practice have changed since I first wrote this page. One thing hasn't: a taste for a class of vehicles I call rangers. Imagine a roving base with mining, rockets, and enough delta-V for major interplanetary journeys. But with such power, roving is not strictly necessary. A ranger can use its rockets to suborbitally hop from place to place on a world.
Well actually, a few things haven't changed. Partularly, I still think exofactories are the future, so much so that I refuse to do interplanetary missions without mining. I admire such missions as feats of skill, but I don't think them worth my time and effort, with 2 exceptions. Ion engines have a high enough delta-V, and I have 1 or 2 ideas for minimalist missions which, if they are even possible, would be remarkable things not already demonstrated by others.