Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tutorial:Satellite Coverage"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Too much math)
 
m (grammar)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Too much math ==
 
== Too much math ==
  
Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already has to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT)
+
Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already had to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:00, 4 June 2013

Too much math

Stephen Hawking once said that every formula reduces book sales by a factor of 2. This applies even more to articles on the Internet. I honestly tried to read and comprehend this article. I already had to force myself through the first section. But then in the second section with formula after formula I just couldn't read on. I would like to recommend to express whatever you are trying to express in this article with some pictures and diagrams instead. That would be much easier to follow. I understand that the math behind this article is important, but it just isn't accessible to a general audience that way. --Crush (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2013 (CDT)