Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dgelessus"
(→Updating the part paths) |
(→Updating the part paths) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
— [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 15:29, 6 June 2013 (CDT) | — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 15:29, 6 June 2013 (CDT) | ||
:Okay you don't have to mark them as deletable. Only spams the logs. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 15:31, 6 June 2013 (CDT) | :Okay you don't have to mark them as deletable. Only spams the logs. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 15:31, 6 June 2013 (CDT) | ||
+ | :I once more forgot about subtemplates... well, I'll just remove the parent then. And thanks alot for deleting the leftover part.cfgs! --[[User:Dgelessus|dgelessus]] <sup>([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Dgelessus|logs]])</sup> 15:58, 6 June 2013 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:58, 6 June 2013
Contents
Plural-s + Links
Hey I noticed your edit. Everything fine, except that your [[Kerbal|Kerbals]] diff will be changed by User:RoboJeb like it already did in that article. Now until yesterday evening I didn't know that the bot is so active ;) but it looks like it still does something. — xZise [talk] 13:06, 6 May 2013 (CDT)
The reason of editing the Language Box?
I don't quiet understand it. As I've said, in order not to make the major Language Box crowded with the branches of language, I set up {{Main Page Layout for zh/Language Box for zh}} to make the Language Box on other languages' Main Page only display one name of the languages. If you think it's unnecessary, all the edits, including specific templates can be undone, instead of only change the main Language Box. ——Cesrate (talk) 19:04, 20 May 2013 (CDT)
- I didn't know that such a sub-language box exists :S The language box edit can be undone then, but on Project:Translation all the codes should be listed in my opinion. That's also where I saw the two Chinese codes in the first place, so I thought these were missing. --Dgelessus (talk) 00:54, 21 May 2013 (CDT)
Right one already exists for Parts/strutConnector/parts.cfg
Hey, you said that the right one for Parts/strutConnector/parts.cfg already exists, but Parts/strutConnector/part.cfg doesn't. If I overlooked something please tell me. But if I can move it, say so and I'll move it to the correct name. — xZise [talk] 13:40, 27 May 2013 (CDT)
Fyi EAS-4 Strut Connector also has a red linked part.cfg. — xZise [talk] 13:41, 27 May 2013 (CDT)
- Whoops, that was just me giving the same reason for the three wrong names I found. DERP! No objections if you move it of course ;) --dgelessus (talk, contribs) 15:26, 27 May 2013 (CDT)
All right no problem anymore
I'll see if I can link the Move Request to that Project... ——Cesrate (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2013 (CDT)
I've fixed the name. Now I'm thinking if this template can automatically report the details to Project:Move, but that seems to be beyond what I can do. ——Cesrate (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2013 (CDT)
Updating the part paths
Hey you already updates some part.cfg paths. Now in general this is nice, but could you please:
-
Mark the old file with {{Delete}}? - You don't need to add parent to the command pods. It actually does nothing, as they already set the parent value.