Difference between revisions of "User talk:UmbralRaptor"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
UmbralRaptor (talk | contribs) |
Nilesrogoff (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How would you feel about having the See Also section removed from Kerbin, Kerbol, Mun, etc.? The celestials template, which is DIRECTLY beneath that, serves the exact same purpose without filling the wiki with redlinks. --{{User:Trinexx/sig2}} 13:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC) | How would you feel about having the See Also section removed from Kerbin, Kerbol, Mun, etc.? The celestials template, which is DIRECTLY beneath that, serves the exact same purpose without filling the wiki with redlinks. --{{User:Trinexx/sig2}} 13:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I'm up for it, at least with the current celestial bodies links. [[User:UmbralRaptor|UmbralRaptor]] ([[User talk:UmbralRaptor|talk]]) 02:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | ::I'm up for it, at least with the current celestial bodies links. [[User:UmbralRaptor|UmbralRaptor]] ([[User talk:UmbralRaptor|talk]]) 02:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | You receive my (un)unofficial not lazy badge for being one of the 3-4 people to help update the wiki to 0.18 :D | ||
+ | [[User:Nilesrogoff|--n]] ([[User talk:Nilesrogoff|talk]]) 12:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:21, 5 December 2012
How would you feel about having the See Also section removed from Kerbin, Kerbol, Mun, etc.? The celestials template, which is DIRECTLY beneath that, serves the exact same purpose without filling the wiki with redlinks. -- Trinexx ► 13:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm up for it, at least with the current celestial bodies links. UmbralRaptor (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
You receive my (un)unofficial not lazy badge for being one of the 3-4 people to help update the wiki to 0.18 :D --n (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)